Best Women's Hiking Shoes of 2025

It’s that time of year! Time to find the perfect present for our adventurous loved ones. We have a list of editor-approved gifts for hikers, as well as more outdoor gift guides tailored for other pursuits. Happy gift giving!

Whether you’re on a casual day hike or hitting the trail overnight, there’s a hiking shoe up for the task. Compared to traditional hiking boots, hiking shoes are characterized by their low-top design, which results in less weight on your feet, allowing you to cover ground quickly. To compile our top picks, the female editors at Switchback Travel took to the trail, testing everything from heavy-duty leather hikers to cushioned trail runners, and the Merrell Moab Speed 2 was the overall favorite women's hiking shoe. For more background information, refer to our comparison table, buying advice, and details about our testing process. For a broader view of the market, consider our article on the best hiking shoes, which covers both men's and women's styles.

Editor's note: We updated this guide on October 21, 2025, to include the latest version of the Brooks Cascadia, add testing notes from the past season, remove discontinued shoes, and refine our lineup. As always, we ensured all information was current at the time of publishing.
 

Our Women's Hiking Shoe Picks

• Best Overall Hiking Shoe: Merrell Moab Speed 2
• Best Lightweight/Cushioned Hiking Shoe: Hoka Speedgoat 6
• Best Budget Hiking Shoe: Merrell Moab 3
• Best Supportive Shoe for Backpacking: La Sportiva Spire GTX
• A Comfortable Shoe for Hard-to-Please Feet: Altra Lone Peak 9  

Best Overall Women's Hiking Shoe

1. Merrell Moab Speed 2 ($140)

Category: Hiking shoe
Weight: 1 lb. 3.4 oz.
Waterproof: No (available)
What we like: Extremely well-rounded—this shoe checks all the right boxes for most hikers.
What we don’t: Roomy toe box and insecure heel make this less secure on technical terrain.

Merrell has long been a leader in hiking footwear, and the Moab Speed 2 takes the cake as our top women’s shoe for 2025. The original Moab Speed brought the much-loved Moab into the modern era, and the 2 carries the torch with a lightweight and cushioned build that will appeal to both day hikers and weight-conscious backpackers. Despite its low weight, the Speed 2 still offers a healthy amount of protection and support—including a generous toe and heel cap and firm midsole—along with a capable Vibram outsole. Merrell also boosted comfort with the latest iteration by utilizing 30% more foam in the midsole, leading to a cushier and less rigid feel. The end result is a hardwearing yet comfortable hiking shoe that toes the line between weight-savings and on-trail performance better than most—and the price is right at just $140.

The Moab Speed 2 will get the job done for the majority of day hikers and ultralight backpackers, but it wouldn’t be our first choice for technical objectives that involve a lot of off-trail travel or scrambling. Our biggest gripes with the latest model are the wide toe box and lack of heel security, which results in a slightly sloppy feel. If you’re headed out on challenging terrain or with a heavy pack, models like the La Sportiva Spire offer more security and underfoot stability, but you'll lose the cushy comfort. The Speed 2 does feel firmer and more planted than the Speedgoat, but lacks the Hoka’s precise feel. In the end, it’s a tall order to recommend a single shoe for a range of hikers and venues, but the Moab Speed 2 nails the all-around equation better than most.
Read more: Merrell Moab Speed 2 GTX review
See the Merrell Moab Speed 2
 

Best Lightweight/Cushioned Hiking Shoe

2. Hoka Speedgoat 6 ($155)

Category: Trail runner
Weight: 1 lb. 0.4 oz.
Waterproof: No (available)
What we like: A lightweight and well-cushioned shoe, great for moving quickly on the trail.
What we don’t: Tall stack height and soft midsole can result in instability.

Hoka's lightweight, cushioned trail running shoes like the Speedgoat 6 have been adopted by the thru-hiking community as a durable, capable shoe that can meet the demands of hikers and minimalist backpackers. The Speedgoat features a tall, cushioned midsole that isolates you nicely from uneven terrain, and you still get ample firmness for covering serious ground. The Vibram outsole is impressively grippy with deep, tightly spaced lugs, and we appreciate the athletic feel of the rockered sole. The Speedgoat 6 also drops just over a half-ounce from version 5, and in an unusual move, the cost didn't go up, which is nice to see. The 5-millimeter drop is moderate enough to help maintain a natural stride without feeling dead underfoot, and the springy EVA midsole helps reduce fatigue over long days.  

If you’re considering a trail running shoe for hiking, there are some longevity and protection considerations to keep in mind, which we go into more below. Further, the Speedgoat 6 has some updates we found to be a downgrade from the 5 in fit and stability, but the update increased midsole and upper durability with a firmer foam and a more stretch-resistant woven textile, so it's kind of a wash. It’s also hard to argue with the thru-hikers who routinely carry heavy packs for 20-mile days wearing this shoe. Finally, if you're pining for the older models, Hoka re-released its iconic Speedgoat 2, with a return to its former glove-like fit and precise on-trail performance. 
Read more: Hoka Speedgoat 6 review | Hoka Speedgoat 2 review
See the Hoka Speedgoat 6
 

Best Budget Hiking Shoe

3. Merrell Moab 3 ($140)

Category: Hiking shoe
Weight: 1 lb. 13.6 oz.
Waterproof: No (available)
What we like: A durable shoe for an affordable price.
What we don’t: Heavy and not built for technical terrain; the price went up $20, making this less of a deal.

For those who prefer a more traditional hiking shoe, there’s a lot to love about the Moab 3. Merrell found a winning formula, combining a comfortable fit with a sturdy build for a reasonable price, though the recent increase makes these less of a deal. The leather upper means you get a boost in protection and durability compared to synthetic designs like the Moab Speed, and mesh panels offer better ventilation than an all-leather model like the La Sportiva TX4 Evo. All in all, the Moab 3 is a hardwearing and time-tested solution for both day hikers and casual overnighters. 

While the Moab 3 checks all the boxes for moderate trails, the shoe is not meant for fast-paced or off-trail endeavors. On rocky and muddy trails, we’ve found that traction and stability fall short of grippier and closer-fitting designs like the Hoka Speedgoat above and the Salomon X Ultra 5 GTX below. And despite clocking in under 2 pounds, the Merrell is one of the heaviest shoes here and will feel cumbersome if you’re used to a more trail runner-inspired design. But for folks that don’t need cutting-edge performance, the Moab 3 is a wonderful hiking shoe with a long and reputable track record to back it up. Finally, Merrell also makes the Moab 3 Waterproof, which retails for $20 more and actually weighs less at 1 pound 10.1 ounces. 
Read more: Merrell Moab 3 review (men's version)
See the Merrell Moab 3
 

Best Supportive Shoe for Backpacking

4. La Sportiva Spire GTX ($209)

Category: Hiking shoe
Weight: 1 lb. 10.2 oz.
Waterproof: Yes
What we like: Raised collar offers more ankle support than most shoes here.
What we don’t: Heavy and pricey.

We hesitate to recommend many of the shoes here for much more than hiking on established trails, but the La Sportiva Spire GTX is an exception. The Spire is a backpacking-ready hiking shoe, with a relatively high collar and design that La Sportiva calls a "low-cut hiking boot." The well-cushioned yet relatively stiff midsole offers a great balance of comfort, protection, and support, which comes in handy for high-mileage days and off-trail scrambling. Throw in excellent grip, good breathability for a waterproof design, and the top-shelf quality we’ve come to expect from this Italian climbing brand, and you have one of the more capable hiking shoes on the market.

But the Spire isn’t for everyone: It’s the most expensive pick on this list, and the stiff and heavy build means it's more shoe than most day hikers need. For a nice middle ground, it’s worth considering La Sportiva’s lighter (1 lb. 2.4 oz.) Akasha II trail runner, which is softer and less supportive than the Spire but well equipped for moving quickly over technical terrain—ideal for hikers looking to retain agility without sacrificing all protection. If you opt for the Spire, note that it’s only offered in a waterproof version, which is great for early-season snow and colder weather but prone to overheating on warm, dry trails. Most day hikers will want to look elsewhere, but for backpackers and those traveling off-trail or above treeline in areas like the High Sierra or Colorado Rockies, the Spire offers an excellent combination of support, durability, and protection.
Read more: La Sportiva Spire GTX review (men's version)
See the La Sportiva Spire GTX
 

A Comfortable Shoe for Hard-to-Please Feet

5. Altra Lone Peak 9 ($140)

Category: Trail runner 
Weight: 1 lb. 2.6 oz.
Waterproof: No (available)
What we like: Flat and roomy footbed offers slipper-like comfort.
What we don’t: Can feel sluggish and imprecise on technical terrain; middling durability.

If you’re among the hikers who suffer from pressure points, hot spots, and blisters, this one’s for you. Popularized by the barefoot running movement, Altra’s zero-drop offerings are arguably the most ergonomic and comfortable on the trail, and their flagship Lone Peak has earned legendary status among the thru-hiking community. With a flat (zero drop) footbed and extra-roomy toe box, this shoe allows the foot to stay in its naturally pronated and splayed position, which is great news for those with wide or particularly finicky feet. True to its trail-worthy intentions, the design also features a rock plate and gaiter attachments. We’ve recommended the Lone Peak to dozens of friends and acquaintances who’ve struck out with more traditional hiking shoes and have yet to lead anyone astray. 

Compared to past iterations of the Lone Peak, the 9 has a more aggressive outsole and a “Ghillie” lacing system with optional pull-through points for a more customizable fit. Altra also simplified the upper from the 8’s streamlined design, with no-sew overlays to reduce peeling and increased durability in the ripstop mesh. The 9 has better durability through the upper than previous versions, though the outsole tread still dulls relatively fast, and the shoes lose structure more quickly than the Speedgoat 6 or Brooks Cascadia 19. And while the Lone Peak is quite comfortable, we’ve also found it to be sluggish and under-cushioned. You get 25 millimeters of stack height, which can feel low for people used to taller midsoles, so if you're looking for the Altra build with more cushion, we recommend the Timp, with 29 millimeters underfoot and a similar design. The 9 is also offered in a 9+ model, which retails for $155 and features a more durable Vibram outsole.
Read more: Altra Lone Peak 9 review
See the Altra Lone Peak 9
 

More of the Best Women's Hiking Shoes

6. Salomon X Ultra 5 GTX ($170)

Category: Hiking shoe
Weight: 1 lb. 6.6 oz.
Waterproof: Yes (non-GTX available)
What we like: Stable and durable without feeling too heavy.
What we don’t: It's not very plush, and the fit is narrow out of the box.

Salomon’s X Ultra has been one of our favorite hiking shoes for years, offering an exceptional combination of comfort, on-trail performance, and durability for everything from casual day hikes to long overnight missions. This most recent update dropped 3 ounces from the pair weight (from 1 lb. 9.6 oz. to 1 lb. 6.6 oz.) and retained the outgoing 4's revised lacing system, more stable chassis, and wider fit in the toe box—though the price went up by $10. Overall, the X Ultra 5 is an ongoing favorite thanks to its fantastic mix of agility, durability, and protection, and, while sparse, there’s enough cushioning underfoot for full days with a loaded pack. 

Older versions of the X Ultra held our top spot for years, but this changed with the 4th iteration. We weren't fans of the prior model's fit, which featured a narrow midfoot and a spacious forefoot. The 5 still has a fairly narrow midfoot, but the toe box feels better aligned with the overall fit of the shoe. Some testers appreciate this locked-down feel, and the tightness on the sides does ease up after a break-in period. That said, we also aren't huge fans of the Quicklace system, preferring a more traditional lacing system that allows for better customization. We could never quite get the Quicklaces to pull tight enough to eliminate a bit of a gap at the ankle. Still, the pros outweigh the cons for us with this classic, and the combo of a respectable weight, grippy traction, and supportive agility makes it a great addition to the closet for more technical hiking and light backpacking.  
Read more: Salomon X Ultra 5 GTX review
See the Salomon X Ultra 5 GTX

7. Brooks Cascadia 19 ($150)

Category: Trail runner
Weight: 1 lb. 3.6 oz.
Waterproof: No (available)
What we like: The recent update increased the cushioning and modernized the style.
What we don’t: Price increased by $10, design has gotten clunkier this year.

Now in its 19th iteration, the Brooks Cascadia is one of the longest-standing trail runners on the market and particularly popular in the thru-hiking community. Like the Speedgoat and Lone Peak above, this shoe bridges the gap for speed-focused hikers with the support and protection you need for long-distance trails alongside a hefty dose of cushioning. And with a minor weight reduction to 1 pound 3.6 ounces for the pair, the Cascadia 19 is one of the lighter shoes on this list. The updated model reduced the drop from 8 millimeters to 6, while the cushion increased from 33 / 25 millimeters to 35 / 29 millimeters. This gives the 19 a bump in ground protection without losing the rebound we love from the energetic, nitrogen-infused midsole.

The Brooks Cascadia, Altra Lone Peak, and Hoka Speedgoat are all excellent choices for hikers who prefer a trail runner over a traditional hiking shoe. All three are reasonably lightweight and more flexible than classic hiking options, though you'll lose some support and longevity with the softer outsoles and mesh-heavy uppers. Where we'd recommend the Cascadia over the Altra or Hoka is as a do-it-all shoe that works for a range of hikers. The Cascadia has more cushion and precision than the Lone Peak 9, but feels more stable than the Speedgoat 6. The fit is also more generalized: increased room in the toe box over the Speedgoat without the sloppy feeling we encounter with the Lone Peak. The Cascadia is further down than the other two, mostly because it doesn't quite specialize in anything, but it did move up in our picks this year thanks to its cushioned, lightweight, unfussy build.
See the Brooks Cascadia 19

8. Hoka Anacapa 2 Low GTX ($180)

Category: Hiking shoe
Weight: 1 lb. 8.8 oz.
Waterproof: Yes (non-GTX available)
What we like: Extremely comfortable, great lacing system and fit, and smooth ride.
What we don’t: Some outsole durability issues and polarizing looks.

The Hoka Speedgoat has achieved legendary status among hikers (specifically the thru-hiking community), but there are some notable trade-offs with the trail-running design. For those who want more support and protection, Hoka also offers an impressive lineup of hiking-specific footwear, including the Anacapa 2 Low. The Anacapa (also available in a mid-height version) features Hoka’s springy midsole, a rockered shape for a smooth ride on the trail, and a beefed-up construction that includes durable nubuck leather and a Gore-Tex waterproof liner. The result is a fast-moving shoe that nicely mixes a trail runner-like feel with the added structure of a hiker.

The Anacapa was recently updated with a focus on more sustainable materials, along with a few noteworthy changes to the midsole and upper. With a less intrusive heel counter, additional tongue padding, and slightly softer midsole, the 2 is arguably more comfortable than the outgoing version, and Hoka also enhanced the toe box for more durability and protection. However, we were surprised to see that the Vibram Megagrip outsole remains virtually unchanged—like the original, it features large sections of blown rubber that are susceptible to damage from rocky trail use. However, the Anacapa 2 is a solid update to a very good hiking shoe, and it’s ideal for those who stick to established trails and prioritize cushy comfort. For a more breathable design for summer hiking, check out the non-waterproof Anacapa Breeze Low for breathability and weight savings.
Read more: Anacapa 2 Low GTX review (men's version)
See the Hoka Anacapa 2 Low GTX

9. Topo Athletic Traverse ($155)

Category: Hiking shoe
Weight: 1 lb. 1.4 oz.
Waterproof: No 
What we like: All the benefits of a trail runner with added durability, support, and protection.
What we don’t: Noticeably stiffer than many other thru-hiker favorites; wide toe box and snug midfoot won’t work for all feet.

Topo Athletic might not be a household name like Salomon or Merrell, but their lineup of trail shoes speaks for itself—plus they’re founded by the former CEO of Vibram. The Traverse is a newer shoe in Topo’s collection, designed specifically for the long-distance thru-hiking community. Durability and protection are two clear highlights of the design, including a tightly woven, abrasion-resistant mesh upper and a rock plate to protect against harsh impacts underfoot. Along with a tacky and aggressive Vibram Megagrip outsole, the Traverse is a more confidence-inspiring companion than the Speedgoat and Lone Peak when the going gets technical. The weight is also competitive, with the Traverse checking in at the lighter end of the grouping.

Both Altra and Topo Athletic shoes have become popular among thru-hikers for their roomy toe boxes, which encourage natural toe splay and accommodate swelling during long trail days. But while Altra’s zero-drop designs can feel sloppy, especially on challenging ground, the Traverse offers a more high-performance feel with a snugger fit (particularly around the midfoot) and a 5-millimeter drop. It's also noticeably stiffer, which led to some foot soreness in testing. If plush comfort is a priority, Topo's Ultraventure 4 is a step up in cushion and is more responsive than the Lone Peak. A final nitpick is that the Traverse is only available in limited, drab colorways. But these complaints do little to detract from the shoes' planted feel on technical ground, great for long-distance hikers who want some added structure.
See the Topo Athletic Traverse

10. Adidas Terrex Free Hiker 2.0 Low Gore-Tex ($180)

Category: Hiking shoe 
Weight: 1 lb. 15.1 oz.
Waterproof: Yes (non-GTX available)
What we like: Excellent traction; highly protective and stable.
What we don’t: Heavy and stiff build, not particularly plush, runs large.

While Adidas hasn't been in the hiking shoe game as long as some other brands, we have been impressed with their Terrex collection over the past few years. The Free Hiker 2.0 Low provides truly impressive traction on technical terrain. The shoe's construction is notably well built, with a substantial outsole and a tightly woven upper reinforced in key places—it's even fared better than some leather designs we've tested. With a rigid structure that provides confidence-inspiring stability, the Free Hiker finds a great balance between a lightweight hiking shoe and a full-on boot. 

At 1 pound 15.1 ounces for a women's size 9 (the women’s 7 is listed at 1 lb. 11.8 oz.), the Free Hiker is on the heavy side for a hiking shoe, especially considering how offerings seem to get lighter every year. In fact, it outweighs many of the top lightweight women's hiking boot options, which will also provide more ankle support and water protection. The Free Hiker's weight, combined with the fact that it runs a bit large, makes it feel clunky—it certainly doesn't feel as nimble as it looks like it would be. The build is also noticeably stiff and without the plushness of other offerings here. That said, while backpacking with the Free Hiker, we felt confident on all manner of terrain, even scree and snow, which could be priceless depending on your adventure style. All told, if you need something for easy trails with a light pack, the Free Hiker is overbuilt; but if you want extra support and protection for harder missions, this is a great contender. 
Read more: Adidas Terrex Free Hiker 2.0 Low review
See the Adidas Terrex Free Hiker 2.0 Low Gore-Tex

11. Salomon Elixir Activ GTX ($155)

Category: Hiking shoe 
Weight: 1 lb. 3.6 oz.
Waterproof: Yes (non-GTX available)
What we like: A true hiking shoe that's not too heavy or stiff for sections of running.
What we don’t: You give up some support and durability with the lightweight build.

Salomon’s X Ultra 5 above is a durable and protective hiking shoe, but weight-conscious and minimalist hikers who don’t mind sacrificing some support should check out their Elixir Activ. A relatively new addition to Salomon’s lineup, these highly cushioned kicks had our tester feeling like she was walking on a cloud. Underfoot protection is excellent thanks to the thick and plush midsole, and the rockered shape helps promote a smooth and responsive ride. While less aggressive than the X Ultra 5, we also had largely positive experiences with the Elixir’s outsole, which features multi-directional lugs that extend slightly past the front for maintaining grip on steep slopes. The cherry on top: The Elixir Activ checks in at just 1 pound 3.6 ounces per pair, which is a considerable 3 ounces lighter than the X Ultra and translates to a very sprightly feel—enough so that it’s easy to mix in some jogging on fastpacking adventures.

As is almost always the case with lightweight hiking footwear, the Elixir Activ GTX sacrifices some support and durability in order to keep weight low. There isn't a lot of lateral stability due to the flexible materials and very low collar, which means your ankle is tasked with doing most of the work (this is especially noticeable on technical and off-camber terrain). Plus, the thin materials are more susceptible to abrasion and snags over time, although our pair held up well to several day hikes on very overgrown trails in Chilean Patagonia.
See the Salomon Elixir Activ GTX

12. Danner Trail 2650 ($170)

Category: Hiking shoe
Weight: 1 lb. 2.0 oz.
Waterproof: No (available)
What we like: It's light and nimble without sacrificing protection or traction; it is high on style points. 
What we don’t: Expensive, ungainly heel counter, and not the most stable shoe here.

Danner originally was known for its work boots, but the longtime footwear brand has made a nice transition to hikers in the past few years. The running shoe-inspired Trail 2650 is clear about its intentions: With the mileage of the Pacific Crest Trail in its name, this shoe is designed to tackle some serious ground. The Trail 2650 is comfortable right out of the box, grippy with a Vibram outsole, and competitively light (especially for a partial-leather design) at 1 pound 2 ounces per pair. Finally, it manages to do what most hiking shoes don’t: look good in the process. All in all, we’re impressed with the direction that Danner is headed, and the Trail 2650 lineup has received rave reviews since its release several years ago.

The version of the Trail 2650 included here isn’t waterproof, but Danner also makes a GTX model, along with a Mid GTX for those who want more ankle protection. It’s also worth taking a look at the Danner Trail 2650 Campo, which tones down the rubber heel counter and adds a lightweight mesh liner. Don’t expect a high level of stability from any of the shoes in the Trail 2650 series—we hesitate to wear them with a heavy pack—but for day hiking and ultralight backpacking, they’re solid all-rounders that are built to last.
Read more: Danner Trail 2650 review (men's version)
See the Danner Trail 2650

13. La Sportiva TX4 Evo ($189)

Category: Approach shoe 
Weight: 1 lb. 12.4 oz.
Waterproof: No
What we like: Excellent grip on rock and stiff construction for rocky terrain; the latest Evo model has a nice sustainability slant.
What we don’t: Too stiff and clunky for easy trails; it is considerably heavier than the original TX4.

Designed as an approach shoe for climbers who routinely head off-trail, the La Sportiva TX4 Evo is a tough and capable shoe that shines on challenging, mountainous terrain. A sticky Vibram sole means you get confidence-inspiring traction on rock, and the generous rubber rand and stiff midsole provide critical protection and stability while boulder-hopping or scrambling up slabs. To top it off, we’ve been particularly impressed by the TX4’s leather upper, which has withstood an incredible amount of abuse with no signs of wearing down. You'll likely need a resole long before the upper starts to deteriorate.

It’s always risky business updating a legendary shoe like the TX4, and we have mixed feelings about the latest TX4 Evo. In addition to a sizable 7.6-ounce weight penalty (per pair) with this update, the TX4 Evo replaces the dotty tread of the original with diamond-shaped lugs, although the sticky “climbing zone” at the forefoot remains. La Sportiva also upped the sustainability focus with recycled materials and a new platform that can be resoled to maximize the shoes’ lifespan—both positive changes. Finally, sizing runs on the smaller end, including a noticeably narrower toe box that may pose issues for some. Updates aside, the TX4 still wouldn't be our first choice as a dedicated trail shoe: It’s stiffer than most hiking shoes (especially when compared to trail runners like the Speedgoat above) and lacks some bite in dirt and soft ground.
Read more: La Sportiva TX4 Evo review (prior version)
See the La Sportiva TX4 Evo 

14. Keen Targhee IV Vent ($160)

Category: Hiking shoe 
Weight: 1 lb. 13.1 oz.
Waterproof: No (available)
What we like: A durable trail workhorse.
What we don’t: Pricier than the Merrell Moab above, without enough to show for it.

Keen's Targhee IV Vent is a classic hiking shoe that goes head-to-head with designs like Merrell's Moab 3 above. The leather upper and sturdy outsole aren’t particularly lightweight (especially compared to modern trail runner-inspired designs), but the benefits are excellent stability over rough terrain, great long-term durability, and impressive all-around protection for your foot. The Targhee also boasts a noticeably wide toe box, which is great for accommodating swollen feet and a nice alternative to some of the narrower designs here. Keen's Targhee Vent is worth adding to your list if you’re in the market for a leather hiking shoe.

Among traditional day hiking options, the Keen Targhee IV Vent and Merrell Moab 3 are two of the most popular shoes on the market. Both are very comfortable right out of the box, offer plenty of support and traction for non-technical trails, and can even get the job done on shorter backpacking trips. But while the Targhee’s nubuck leather upper is a little more durable than the mesh used on the Moab, we’re not sure it’s worth the $30 bump. Further, within this price class, the Keen contends with more modern designs like the Salomon X Ultra 5 above, which offers a closer fit and better performance overall. And with last year's update, weight jumped a considerable 4.4 ounces per pair, although the Targhee's updated polyurethane midsole is designed to boost underfoot protection and compress less over time. For those who frequently hike in wet climates like the Pacific Northwest, the design also comes in a waterproof version.
See the Keen Targhee IV Vent

15. On Cloudrock Waterproof Low ($200)

Category: Hiking shoe 
Weight: 1 lb. 7.4 oz.
Waterproof: Yes
What we like: Good support and protection in a quick-moving design; crossover for casual use.
What we don’t: Stiff and pricey; the outsole accumulates debris and mud.

Best known for their distinctive outsole, Swiss running brand On entered the hiking market a few years ago with a small selection of trail-ready designs. They've since increased their offerings, including the Cloudrock Waterproof. Similar to the now-discontinued Cloudwander, the Cloudrock combines the stability and protection of a hiking shoe with the agility of a running shoe, featuring a rockered design that encourages a fluid stride alongside generous toe and heel protection and TPU overlays. You also get decent waterproofing by way of On’s in-house waterproof membrane. Unlike many of the shoes above, the Cloudrock's design is a nice crossover for in-town use. 

We have experienced stiffness issues with On's CloudTec cushioning, though, and haven't necessarily found it comfortable for all-day wear. We've taken On's hiking shoes, both day hiking and backpacking—on easy trails and over cross-country terrain—and found them to be fairly unforgiving. The outsole channels have a tendency to accumulate debris and mud. While the reinforced upper holds up to a lot of abuse, we have durability concerns with the outsole, which packed out significantly during one week of testing. 
See the On Cloudrock Waterproof Low

Women's Hiking Shoe Comparison Table

About Our Testing Process

Hiking shoes come in all shapes and sizes, from hefty leather designs for overnight backpacking to trail runners adopted by fast-and-light thru-hikers. Contributing editor Maggie Slepian now maintains and researches products for this women's-specific guide, using her decade of technical gear testing experience and thru-hikes to refine her recommendations.

Our current lineup of 15 women’s hiking shoes is the result of our collective experiences both on and off the trail, along with feedback from our network of female testers and the online hiking community. When we test hiking shoes, we take them on everything from mellow day hikes to multi-day backpacking trips, paying attention to the amount of padding underfoot, the level of grip on various types of terrain, and the quality of everything from the hardware and laces to the upper and outsole. We also consider protection—both at the front of the shoe and underfoot—as well as breathability and overall fit. This season, our hiking shoes took us through early-season snow high at 10,000 feet in Great Basin National Park, along soggy backpacking trails, through gritty desert sand, and along the steep trails around British Columbia. As we continue testing, we’ll add and remove options above depending on their performance.
 

Women’s Hiking Shoe Buying Advice

• Women’s-Specific Hiking Shoes
• Hiking Footwear Types
• Weight
• Stability and Support
• Waterproofing
• Breathability
• Lacing Systems
• Upper Materials
• Midsoles: EVA Foam and TPU
• Outsoles and Traction
• Toe Protection
• Sustainability
• Hiking Shoes vs. Hiking Boots

Women’s-Specific Hiking Shoes

Most hiking shoes will come in both men’s and women’s versions. Women’s shoes are generally designed to fit narrower heels and higher arches, come in women’s-specific sizes and widths, and are offered in different colors. While the majority of our female friends wear women’s shoes, some women might be better off opting for a men’s model, especially women with high-volume or wide feet. As with all clothing and footwear, your best bet is to try on before buying.
 

Hiking Footwear Types

Hiking Shoes
For most trails except highly technical terrain, a low-cut hiking shoe that sits just below the ankle is the best bet. The majority of these shoes are lightweight, trail-runner-inspired designs like the Salomon Elixir Activ GTX, though more traditional holdouts include leather designs reminiscent of a low-top hiking boot, like the Merrell Moab 3. Regardless of style, most of these shoes offer ample stability, protection, and traction for tackling rough trails with a load by way of stiff midsoles and outsoles, toe caps, and reinforced uppers. Hiking shoes are also great options for folks needing a substantial shoe for daily wear—just be aware that the outsoles will wear faster on pavement.
 

Trail Running Shoes
For fast-moving hikers, we’d recommend a trail running shoe. These shoes, including the Hoka Speedgoat, Altra Lone Peak, and Brooks Cascadia, are a lightweight option popular among thru-hikers and fast packers. However, trail runners weren't originally intended as backpacking footwear, and the flexible midsoles don’t provide as much support on technical terrain or while carrying a heavy load. They also have less durability, and the midsole packs out faster than tougher hiking shoes. But for day hikes or experienced backpackers, it's hard to knock the comfort you get with a flexible build and ample cushioning. You can find more of our picks in our guide to the best trail running shoes.
 

Approach Shoes
The third option has a relatively narrow focus: climbers or hikers who need a grippy shoe to tackle steep, rocky terrain, often for the approach to a rock climb. Approach shoes are easy to spot: they have a large rubber toe rand, full-length, and a sticky, low-profile rubber outsole with rounded lugs for maximum grip on rock. These shoes can be comfortable on day hikes, but aren’t what we recommend as a daily driver. The tread isn't as secure on muddy trails, and they’re stiffer than most hiking shoes, which can mean discomfort on high-mileage days. But if your hikes include a lot of scrambling or rock hopping, an approach shoe can be an excellent choice. The La Sportiva TX4 Evo is our only approach shoe on this list, but for a complete look, check out our article on the best approach shoes.
 

Weight

Over the past decade, one of the most significant advances in hiking shoes has been the move to lighter-weight designs. As a result, most shoes on our list weigh well under 2 pounds for the pair, with some dropping to just over 1 pound. By comparison, a traditional backpacking boot like the Asolo TPS 520 GV Evo tips the scales at just under 4 pounds. It's true that the drop in ounces sometimes impacts long-term durability, but there are still a number of compelling options for traditionalists, including the leather Merrell Moab 3 and Keen Targhee line. But for most, a lightweight trail-runner-inspired shoe is the best choice for day hikes, peak bagging, and overnight trips. As long as the rest of your gear is equally light, there are very few sacrifices.
 

Stability and Support

Whether opting for a new-school synthetic model or a more traditional leather hiker, most hiking shoes retain good stability and support thanks to robust uppers, midsoles, and relatively rigid soles. For example, despite having the appearance of a trail runner, the Scarpa Rush 2 GTX incorporates a stiff TPU frame and a heavier sole that prioritizes durability and stability. Hiking shoes also offer solid protection with toe caps, generous rands, and burly nylon or leather uppers. You don't get the added ankle support of a hiking boot, but most hiking shoes offer decent performance for tricky terrain or while carrying a load.
 

If you do choose to go with a lightweight trail runner, keep in mind that the trade-off is decreased stability and support. These shoes have more flexible midsoles, and the large dose of cushioning underfoot is great for comfort but offers less structure for off-camber sections of trail. The mesh upper of a trail runner also lacks around-the-foot protection and leaves your feet more vulnerable to roots and rocks. These are compromises that many day hikers (and well-conditioned backpackers) are willing to put up with for a more nimble, lightweight shoe. However, in most cases, we hesitate to recommend a trail running shoe for inexperienced hikers and difficult trails, including off-trail scrambling.
 

Waterproofing

Most of the hiking shoes here come in both waterproof and non-waterproof versions. The extra protection from a waterproof, breathable membrane is a nice security blanket if you plan to hike in the mountains or in shoulder-season conditions, where wet feet can grow cold quickly. In theory, these shoes should keep your feet dry during creek crossings, surprise rainfall, or if you hit snow on an early-season trek. If you go this route, we’ve found Gore-Tex models to work consistently well, and many in-house designs are similarly capable of keeping water out, though breathability is a different story.
 

However, there are a number of downsides to going with a waterproof shoe: The extra layer adds weight, impacts breathability fairly significantly (discussed below), and often costs $20–$30 more. If you do get water inside your shoe, these won't drain as well and won’t dry out as quickly as a non-waterproof option. If you tend to get out mostly during the summer or live in a dry area, we recommend a non-waterproof shoe. Another option that we’ve adopted for snowy summer hikes is to pair a non-waterproof shoe with a waterproof sock. This lends a lot of versatility: You get protection when you need it, but your shoe will still dry out quickly after a dousing. For more on the waterproofing debate, see our article Do You Need Waterproof Hiking Shoes?
 

Breathability

Unfortunately, waterproof liners, even expensive Gore-Tex varieties, don’t breathe well. just as a waterproof jacket won’t be as breathable as a comparable non-waterproof version. Waterproof membranes restrict a shoe’s ability to pull moisture from your sweaty feet as efficiently as a non-waterproof upper. However, there is a range of breathability in non-waterproof shoes. Footwear made with lighter fabrics and a lot of mesh increases moisture transfer and airflow, which will keep feet less sweaty and dry out soggy socks faster. On the other hand, full-on leather shoes with built-in waterproofing are among the least breathable.
 

Lacing Systems

Laces—as well as the lacing system of hooks and eyelets—play an essential role in fit and comfort. If a shoe has a poor lacing system and is prone to loosening, you’ll have to readjust constantly. If the system doesn’t secure your heel well, friction from each step can create hot spots and blisters. If the culprit is just the laces themselves, it’s an easy fix: There are a number of quality replacement laces available. But if the system design doesn’t hold your foot, we recommend looking elsewhere.
 

Some models, including the Salomon X Ultra 5 GTX and XA Pro 3D V9 GTX, have a single-pull lacing system. The design is very convenient, and we’ve had no more issues with durability than traditional laces. One thing to keep in mind, however, is that you aren’t able to adjust the tension between eyelets, so the fit will be equally tight across the entire foot. In other words, those with finicky feet that need to fine-tune their laces to be comfortable may be better off avoiding quick-lace designs.
 

Upper Materials

Checking the shoe's construction can give helpful insights into the shoe’s performance. The type of material correlates directly with a shoe's longevity, water resistance, and breathability. Most often, hiking shoes are made with a mix of nylon, mesh, and leather to balance cost, weight savings, and durability. 

Synthetic Nylon and Mesh
Woven synthetic (often nylon) as well as open synthetic mesh panels are commonly used to aid breathability. These materials are not as well known for their durability, but they do a great job cutting weight and are generally easy to break in. Note that neither synthetic materials nor leather conforms to your foot over time, but in most cases, the overall fit is still comfortable and snug. The majority of our favorite hiking shoes (and almost all modern designs) are made with synthetic materials, which provide a hard-to-beat balance of weight, durability, protection, and breathability.
 

Nubuck Leather
Made of full-grain leather but given a brushed finish that has a suede-like feel, nubuck leather is a common sight on heavier-duty hiking shoes. The soft-touch leather is lighter and more flexible than full-leather options and more durable than most nylons. It does fall short in breathability, however, and generally weighs more. As a result, it’s common to find a mix of leather and nylon mesh for abrasion resistance and breathability, as seen on the Merrell Moab 3. If you’re looking to prioritize durability and protection above all else, a leather hiking shoe is a good choice, but these designs feel fairly dated compared to modern synthetic shoes.
 

Midsoles: EVA Foam and TPU

The midsole of your hiking shoe cushions your stride, working as a shock absorber and providing a stable base so your feet don’t have to work so hard on off-camber terrain. Depending on the design, midsoles vary from thin, lightweight trail runners to stiff and substantial on heavier hiking shoes. Most include EVA, TPU, or a combination.

EVA
EVA foam midsoles are a common sight on running and hiking footwear. The cushy, soft material takes some of the sting out of both heel impact and forefoot spring and is extremely lightweight. While nearly all shoes on this list use some sort of EVA, designs vary. For logging serious miles on tougher terrain, we prefer a firm, supportive midsole as opposed to too much cushioning. If we’re planning on moving quickly on an easy trail, softer cushioning is a better bet and commonly found in trail running designs like the Hoka Speedgoat. However, soft midsoles have a tendency to pack down over time, so expect these shoes to have a shorter lifespan than dedicated hiking shoes.
 

TPU
Thermoplastic polyurethane, shortened to TPU, is a durable plastic commonly found in performance-oriented hiking shoes. Shoes that use TPU underfoot are often less cushy than those with only EVA, but will last longer and provide better protection and stability underfoot. In addition, they’ll keep their shape longer and won’t be prone to compressing like EVA. Because both midsole types have valid applications and TPU is more expensive, it’s common for a manufacturer to use a TPU frame or heel for stability and toughness and add in EVA underfoot to increase comfort. Finally, the absence of TPU is a good way to differentiate a trail running shoe from a hiking shoe—most running designs forgo this plastic in order to stay flexible and cushioned, but the trade-off is less stability and isolation from rough terrain.
 

Outsoles and Traction

One of the hallmarks of a hiking shoe is good traction on a variety of terrain. In a way that more casual footwear can never match, hiking and trail running footwear are leaps and bounds better when the going gets rocky, slippery, and steep. Vibram is the gold standard when it comes to outsole rubber, but not all Vibram compounds should be treated equally: The rubber manufacturer tailors their blends and designs for the specific footwear and brand. Some shoes have much larger and sharper lugs underfoot for serious grip in mud, while others prioritize sticky rubber for scrambling over rocks.
 

Salomon is one brand that doesn’t outsource their traction needs. Instead, they use their in-house Contagrip for all of their hiking and trail running models. We’ve found the level of quality and performance is on par with Vibram’s offerings, from anything from their lighter Ultra 5 hiking shoes to the hefty Quest 4 backpacking boots. Like Vibram, Contagrip compounds can vary between shoes, and there are a number of different compounds, including Contagrip MA, MD, and TA.
 

Toe Protection

Most hiking trails are full of rocks, roots, and other potential hazards, so we usually recommend a hiking shoe with some type of toe cap. Hiking shoes typically have a full rubber toe cap, but trail runners sometimes have a trimmed-down version or none at all—one of the compromises in opting for a minimalist shoe. Approach shoes like the La Sportiva TX4 Evo, on the other hand, have exceptional protection with a standard wraparound rubber rand and stiff midsole and outsole.
 

Insoles

The stock insoles that come with most hiking shoes are fairly cheap. For some, this might not make a difference, but for others, it’s what separates comfort from misery. Replacing your insoles with an aftermarket model specific to your foot size and shape can remedy most shoe maladies, and removing the stock midsoles is simple. New insoles can provide more or less volume to fill out the shoe, improve the fit under the arch, and increase or decrease the cushion and impact absorption. We recommend checking out Superfeet insoles for their wide selection of options and trusted reputation in daily shoes, ski boots, and hiking footwear.
 

Sustainability

In 2025, one of the main ways that brands are innovating is with sustainable design practices that seek to mitigate our impact on the planet. When it comes to footwear, manufacturers are turning to recycled and recyclable materials for everything from laces and lining to foam midsoles and rubber outsoles. Another way to shop sustainably is to keep durability in mind—if it fits your hiking style, a shoe with a more hardwearing upper and sole might last you twice as long as a trail runner, which cuts your consumption in half. Or, opt for shoes that are designed to be resoled, such as the La Sportiva TX4 Evo. It’s worth noting that services like Danner's Recrafting are committed to rebuilding and resoling footwear to keep it on the trail and out of the landfill. And when the time does come to retire your beloved hiking shoes, consider recycling them via programs like Ridwell or Terracycle.
 

Hiking Shoes vs. Hiking Boots

One of the biggest trends we see across the board in the outdoor space is the move towards lighter-weight gear. This is exemplified in the world of hiking footwear, where, in just a couple of short decades, we’ve gone from 4-pound leather boots being standard issue to most hikers now wearing lightweight hiking shoes or trail runners. However, hiking boots still have their place, particularly for rugged terrain and schlepping a heavy multi-day load. We also specifically recommend a mid-height shoe for those needing extra protection around their ankles.
 

The biggest point of differentiation between hiking shoes and boots is height: Shoes have a low-top fit, while boots generally sit above the ankle. Given their increased coverage, boots are able to offer a more secure fit, better stability, and more protection overall. Similar to hiking shoes, most modern hiking boots are built with lightweight materials and nicely balance agility and performance (even the Altra Lone Peak trail runner comes in a mid-height waterproof boot). That said, for anything but the most rugged of trails or the heaviest loads, we usually find ourselves reaching for a hiking shoe. You’ll have to decide for yourself, but both are viable options for day hiking, backpacking, and non-alpine peak bagging. For our breakdown of the top models on the market—including everything from mid-height trail running shoes to traditional leather designs—see our article on the best women's hiking boots.
Back to Our Top Women's Hiking Shoe Picks  Back to Our Women's Hiking Shoe Comparison Table