Best Hiking Shoes of 2025

It’s that time of year! Time to find the perfect present for our adventurous loved ones. We have a list of editor-approved gifts for hikers, as well as more outdoor gift guides tailored for other pursuits. Happy gift giving!

Hiking footwear is shifting away from bulky boots toward lightweight shoes and even trail runners, which are faster and more comfortable. You do lose some ankle support when carrying a heavy pack or traversing rocky trails, but the weight savings and feathery feel are worth it for many. Our team of avid hikers and backpackers has worn hundreds of pairs of shoes over the years to narrow down the streamlined selection of 13 models you see below, ranging from ultralight options for fast-and-light trips to more supportive models for carrying a full pack. The Salomon X Ultra 5 GTX currently leads the charge, with the Merrell Moab Speed 2 a close runner-up. For more background information, see our comparison table and buying advice below the picks, as well as our breakdown on how we approach the testing process. If you're looking for a different style of hiking footwear, we took a similar approach in putting together our lists of the best hiking boots and best trail running shoes. And if you often find yourself on uneven, rocky terrain for a lot of your treks, it may be worth checking out our list of the best approach shoes. Finally, while this article includes both men's and women's styles, we've also put together a dedicated list of the best women's hiking shoes.

Editor's note: We updated this guide on November 25, 2025, to crown the Salomon X Ultra 5 as our new pick for the best overall men's hiking shoe. We also removed the unavailable Scarpa Rush 2 GTX and Adidas Terrex AX4, and added the Xero Shoes Scrambler Low EV Shoes. Finally, we ensured that all other information was up to date at the time of publishing.
 

Our Team's Hiking Shoe Picks

Men's Hiking Shoes

• Best Overall Hiking Shoe: Salomon X Ultra 5 GTX
• Runner-Up at a Great Price: Merrell Moab Speed 2
• Another Excellent Budget Option: Merrell Moab 3
• Best Shoe for Backpacking on Technical Trails: La Sportiva Spire GTX
• Best Max Cushion Hiking Shoe: Hoka Speedgoat 6
• Best Hiking Shoe for Off-Trail Scrambling: La Sportiva TX4 Evo
• A Comfortable Shoe for Hard-to-Please Feet: Altra Lone Peak 9
• Our Other Favorite Hiking Shoes
   

Women's Hiking Shoes

• Best Overall Hiking Shoe: Salomon X Ultra 5 GTX
• Runner-Up at a Great Price: Merrell Moab Speed 2
• Another Excellent Budget Option: Merrell Moab 3
• Best Shoe for Backpacking on Technical Trails: La Sportiva Spire GTX
• Best Max Cushion Hiking Shoe: Hoka Speedgoat 6
• Best Hiking Shoe for Off-Trail Scrambling: La Sportiva TX4 Evo
• A Comfortable Shoe for Hard-to-Please Feet: Altra Lone Peak 9
• Our Other Favorite Hiking Shoes
   

 
Best Overall Hiking Shoe

1. Men's Salomon X Ultra 5 Gore-Tex & Women's X Ultra 5 ($170)

Category: Hiking shoe
Weight per pair: 1 lb. 10.8 oz. (men's), 1 lb. 6.6 oz. (women's)
Waterproof: Yes (Gore-Tex)
What we like: Great balance of weight and on-trail performance.
What we don’t: Love-it-or-hate-it fit and comfort.

Salomon’s X Ultra has been one of our favorite hiking shoes for years, offering an exceptional combination of comfort, on-trail performance, and durability for everything from casual day hikes to ambitious overnight missions. Version 3 of the X Ultra was a standout, while version 4 was a flop for many; however, the 5 seems to be on a slow path back to redemption. Beyond its sleeker and more modern look, the X Ultra 5 features a revised lacing system and chassis, along with a roomier fit in the toe box (many folks struggled with the narrow toebox on the last version, so we appreciate this change). Importantly, the shoe retains its fantastic mix of agility, support, durability, and protection, and there’s enough cushioning underfoot for full days with a loaded pack—though we still like to add a Superfeet insole for longer trips when we need a bit more. Finally, at 1 pound 10.8 ounces (1 lb. 6.6 oz. for the women's), it’s competitively lightweight and nimble.

The X Ultra 5 snags our top spot thanks to some improvements over the prior version. The 4 featured a narrow midfoot, spacious forefoot, and a hard-to-customize quick-pull lacing system. For some, this offered a locked-down feel but perhaps too roomy of a toe box; for others, it was ideal in the forefoot but too tight at the arch. The 5 seems to address some of these qualms (though the Quicklace system is still not our favorite), thanks to the forefoot being more in balance with the rest of the shoe's fit. That said, we did find both the fore and midfoot tight out of the box, leading to several days of discomfort while breaking everything in. Thankfully, everything loosened up after a couple of days in the field, with no hotspots or blisters, and we were rewarded with a shoe that we could easily and comfortably wear all day. Long story short, if you can try this one on before you buy and it agrees with your foot shape, the X Ultra 5 is undeniably a high-performance, quality option for technical hikes and lighter backpacking adventures. 
Read more: Salomon X Ultra 5 review (women's version)
See the Men's Salomon X Ultra 5 Gore-Tex  See the Women's Salomon X Ultra 5 Gore-Tex
 

Runner-Up at a Great Price

2. Men's Merrell Moab Speed 2 & Women's Moab Speed 2 ($140)

Category: Hiking shoe
Weight per pair: 1 lb. 8 oz. (men's), 1 lb. 3.4 oz. (women's)
Waterproof: No (available)
What we like: Extremely well-rounded—this shoe checks all the right boxes for most hikers.
What we don’t: Roomy toe box and insecure heel make this less secure on technical terrain.

Merrell has been a staple in the hiking footwear world for ages, and their Moab Speed 2 stands out as a great choice at a price you can't beat. Building on the success of the original Moab Speed, this second iteration brings a modern, trail-ready feel with its lightweight yet well-cushioned design—perfect for everything from mellow day hikes to fast-and-light backpacking missions. Despite tipping the scales on the lighter side, the Speed 2 still offers solid protection and support, featuring a firm midsole, reinforced toe and heel caps, and a grippy Vibram outsole. Merrell also enhanced comfort by adding 30% more foam to the midsole, resulting in a softer, more forgiving feel underfoot. The result is a durable and impressively comfortable shoe that strikes one of the best balances we’ve seen between weight savings, all-around performance, and price. 

That said, the Moab Speed 2 isn’t without compromise. The roomy toe box and somewhat loose heel lead to a slightly imprecise fit, which may frustrate hikers tackling steep, rocky terrain or carrying heavier loads. For those needs, options like the La Sportiva Spire below offer greater security and underfoot stability, albeit at the cost of some plushness. The Speed 2 feels a bit firmer and more planted than Hoka’s Speedgoat (also below), though it can’t quite match the Spire's precise, athletic feel. Still, for most hikers seeking a versatile, comfortable, and lightweight shoe that can handle a wide range of trail conditions, the Moab Speed 2 strikes a near-perfect sweet spot.
Read more: Merrell Moab Speed 2 GTX review
See the Men's Merrell Moab Speed 2  See the Women's Merrell Moab Speed 2
 

Another Excellent Budget Option

3. Men's Merrell Moab 3 & Women's Merrell Moab 3 ($140)

Category: Hiking shoe
Weight per pair: 2 lb. 1 oz. (men's), 1 lb. 10 oz. (women's)
Waterproof: No (available)
What we like: Great value for a very comfortable and well-built hiking shoe.
What we don’t: Not built for technical terrain.

These may not be your long-distance or fast-and-light hiking shoes, but there is a lot to like about Merrell’s flagship Moab 3. What has made this shoe so popular over the years? Most notably, it's the lightweight but planted feel, comfortable and well-padded fit, excellent durability, and attractive price point. Merrell updated the Moab a few seasons ago, incorporating recycled materials, a revamped insole, and subtle updates to cushioning and traction, but the formula remains largely the same and is a crowd-pleaser for a reason. For day hikers sticking to established trails, the Moab 3 is comfy and a great value.

In terms of downsides, on rocky and muddy trails, we’ve found that the Moab’s traction and stability fall short of a performance shoe like the Salomon X Ultra 5 or the La Sportiva Spire. And at 2 pounds 1 ounce for a pair (1 lb. 10 oz. for the women's version), it feels a little slow and cumbersome compared to some lighter and nimbler alternatives on our list. But these are reasonable trade-offs for casual hikers, and it’s hard to deny the price, which checks in less than many other options. Keep in mind that we included the non-waterproof version here, but Merrell also makes a waterproof model with their in-house membrane, along with an upgraded Gore-Tex version.
Read more: Merrell Moab 3 review (men's version)
See the Men's Merrell Moab 3  See the Women's Merrell Moab 3
 

Best Shoe for Backpacking on Technical Trails

4. Men's La Sportiva Spire GTX & Women's Spire GTX ($219)

Category: Hiking shoe
Weight per pair: 1 lb. 15 oz. (men's), 1 lb. 10.2 oz. (women's)
Waterproof: Yes (Gore-Tex Surround)
What we like: A backpacking-ready shoe that is tough, comfortable, and well-made.
What we don’t: Super pricey and a bit heavy.

Many of the designs on our list are lightweight or almost trail runner-like in nature (or are actual trail running shoes like the Hoka Speedgoat below), but La Sportiva’s burly Spire GTX is designed for those who prefer a heftier shoe for more aggressive backpacking adventures. It feels sturdy and substantial with good stiffness and a thick midsole, effectively isolating you from rough and rocky trails (La Sportiva even goes so far as to call it a low-cut hiking boot). Throw in excellent protection and grip over a variety of terrain, plus a quality build that we’ve come to expect from this Italian climbing brand, and you have one of the more capable hiking shoes on the market.

At nearly 2 pounds, the Spire GTX is heavy for a low-top hiking shoe, and it also sits relatively high on the ankle. Second, the price tag makes it the most expensive model on this list, and notably pricier than many full-on hiking boots. Finally, we appreciate the accommodating fit, which should work well for most foot types, but the shoe is slightly wide at the heel, and we had to cinch it down tightly to avoid slippage. These issues aside, it’s hard to knock the performance chops or build quality of the Spire if it feels good on your foot; it offers a nice step up in on-trail performance and durability compared to the TX4 Evo below.
Read more: La Sportiva Spire GTX review (men's version)
See the Men's La Sportiva Spire  See the Women's La Sportiva Spire
 

Best Max Cushion Hiking Shoe

5. Men's Hoka Speedgoat 6 & Women's Speedgoat 6 ($155)

Category: Trail runner
Weight per pair: 1 lb. 3.6 oz. (men's), 1 lb. 0.4 oz. (women's)
Waterproof: No (available)
What we like: Lightweight feel, grippy outsole, thick but supportive cushioning.
What we don’t: Not as durable as a dedicated hiking shoe; we liked prior versions even more.

Hoka used to be a niche brand for runners, but that has changed dramatically over the years, and the brand is now a go-to option for hikers. The Speedgoat 6 is the perfect example. This trajectory makes sense: More and more people are ditching their burly boots for hiking shoes and trail runners. If you stay mostly on established trails and aren’t scrambling or carrying a heavy backpacking pack, a lightweight trail running shoe can offer the best combination of performance and comfort. And with thick yet supportive cushioning, an impressively grippy sole, and a long track record of success, the Hoka Speedgoat is our absolute favorite hiking shoe for just about any backpacking or hiking trip. Our author wore the Speedgoat 2 for back-to-back thru-hikes of the Continental Divide Trail and Appalachian Trail in 2021, achieving incredible results: four pairs lasted him the entirety of the 5,000-plus-mile journey and withstood serious torture in every imaginable environment (read our in-depth review of the reissued Speedgoat 2 here). While the Speedgoat isn't for everyone (the high cushion won't be the best for hikers with weak ankles), it has consistently been the top shoe we've seen serious hikers wear on long trails around the world.

It's always risky business updating a legendary design like the Speedgoat, and while we stand by this shoe, we still feel that Hoka fell a bit short with version 6. The shoe offers a little more stability and durability than the outgoing model, thanks to a firmer midsole and a more stretch-resistant upper. However, it’s notably less plush and springy than prior versions—a significant reason many people turn to Hoka in the first place—despite boasting more cushioning underfoot. We also wish the tongue were longer to prevent it from bunching underneath the top laces, and breathability is slightly compromised due to the more abrasion-resistant materials. On the bright side, Hoka retained the aggressive Vibram outsole that we love and managed to trim approximately an ounce per pair while enhancing overall durability. All told, for those with serious backpacking missions in their crosshairs—or if you're after a plush ride for casual day hikes—the Speedgoat is just about as good as it gets. 
Read more: Hoka Speedgoat 6 review (women's version)
See the Men's Hoka Speedgoat 6  See the Women's Hoka Speedgoat 6
 

Best Hiking Shoe for Off-Trail Scrambling

6. Men's La Sportiva TX4 Evo & Women's TX4 Evo ($189)

Category: Approach shoe
Weight per pair: 1 lb. 12 oz. (men's), 1 lb. 8 oz. (women's)
Waterproof: No (available)
What we like: Approach shoe grip with hiking shoe comfort.
What we don’t: Heavier and less malleable than the previous iteration; leather upper limits breathability; pricey.

The La Sportiva TX4 Evo—the brand's latest take on their longstanding TX4—certainly isn’t a traditional pick, but boy, do we love this shoe. It’s built as an approach shoe, which means that it’s grippy and tough for long hikes to climbing objectives or traveling over steep, rocky terrain. The Vibram outsole, full rubber rand, and smooth area of sticky rubber under the toe make it a great option for scrambling, smearing, and edging on rock. However, what we have been impressed with most is its versatility: The TX4 performs equally well when moving quickly on the trail, thanks to its light and moderately flexible construction. We even like it for everyday use due to the high levels of comfort and attractive design. 

As with most approach shoes, the TX4 Evo has its limitations. The tread grips exceptionally well on both wet and dry rock, and even impressed us with its traction on snow, but falls short of a true hiking shoe in dirt and mud. We also found the latest Evo model to be more rigid than the previous version, which was already relatively stiff and inflexible, although overall support and comfort are similar (and the shoe does break in a fair amount over time). But overall, don’t be dissuaded by the approach shoe label: The TX4 Evo is a worthy companion for long days on the trail, and the addition of eco-friendly touches like recycled materials and a resolable platform are certainly noteworthy. Finally, keep in mind that La Sportiva makes this shoe in a number of versions, from the uber-lightweight TX2 Evo up to the hardwearing TX Hike Mid and TX4 Evo Mid GTX (the latter two are full-on hiking boots).
Read more: La Sportiva TX4 Evo Mid GTX (women's full hiking boot version)
See the Men's La Sportiva TX4 Evo  See the Women's La Sportiva TX4 Evo
 

A Comfortable Shoe for Hard-to-Please Feet

7. Men's Altra Lone Peak 9 & Women's Lone Peak 9 ($140)

Category: Trail runner
Weight per pair: 1 lb. 6.4 oz. (men's), 1 lb. 3 oz. (women's)
Waterproof: No (available)
What we like: A thru-hiker favorite thanks to its low weight and comfort-first design.
What we don’t: Roomy fit and flexible build aren’t ideal for difficult terrain; not as durable as other options here. 

Similar to the Speedgoat above, Altra’s Lone Peak was initially designed as a running shoe and has since become a favorite among thru-hikers. But while we love the Speedgoat for its agility and cushioning, the Lone Peak is highlighted for a different skill set: it has a roomy toe box, features a zero-drop shape that encourages a natural stride, and it offers great ground feel with just 25 millimeters of stack height compared to the Speedgoat’s 40 millimeters (at the heel). It all adds up to a very comfortable shoe that’s especially ideal for long-distance hikers with wide or hard-to-please feet. In fact, an older version of the Lone Peak was one of our editor's shoes of choice for a thru-hike of the Pacific Crest Trail, keeping him cozy and injury-free the entire way.

The latest Lone Peak 9 is arguably our favorite iteration yet: Altra reinforced the upper with a tougher, more abrasion-resistant ripstop mesh, upgraded the traction with a grippier and longer-lasting MaxTrac outsole, and refined the midsole for better comfort and ground feel. They also introduced a new Lone Peak 9+ variation that swaps in a Vibram sole—our top pick when it comes to rubber compounds. Staying true to its trail-focused design, the Lone Peak still includes a rock plate and gaiter attachments. That said, its zero-drop platform isn’t for everyone—those used to more traditional shoes and trail runners may find it a bit flat, under-cushioned (the 25mm stack isn’t especially plush), and short on arch support. Still, there’s a reason this shoe has earned cult status, particularly among fast-and-light backpackers.
Read more: Altra Lone Peak 9 review (women's version)
See the Men's Altra Lone Peak 9  See the Women's Altra Lone Peak 9
 

Our Other Favorite Hiking Shoes
 

A Solid Trail to Town Pick

8. Men's Danner Trail 2650 & Women's Trail 2650 ($170)

Category: Hiking shoe
Weight per pair: 1 lb. 8 oz. (men's), 1 lb. 2 oz. (women's)
Waterproof: No (available)
What we like: Comfortable, grippy, and looks good for use around town.
What we don’t: Pricey and can’t match the X Ultra above in stability.

Danner is best known for their work boots, but the longtime footwear brand has made a notable transition to hikers in recent years. The Trail 2650—named after the length of the Pacific Crest Trail—has a lot going for it: It’s comfortable right out of the box, grippy with a Vibram outsole, and impressively light at 1 pound 8 ounces per pair (just 1 lb. 2 oz. for the women's version). And this shoe manages to do what most hiking shoes don’t: look good in the process. All in all, we’re impressed with the direction that Danner is headed, and the Trail 2650 is one of the more versatile options on this list.

Despite its lightweight build, the Danner offers a step up in protection compared to the trail running shoes on this list, with generous heel and toe protection and a fairly stiff rubber sole. On the other hand, it’s far from the most stable design here—with a low collar and less of a locked-down feel than shoes like the La Sportiva Spire or Salomon X Ultra, it will show its weakness on tricky terrain or while hauling a heavy load. What’s more, we’re not quite sure what to make of the rather massive piece of rubber on the heel, which seems to go above and beyond the necessary levels of protection. But these are small complaints about an otherwise comfortable, capable, and stylish lightweight hiking shoe.
Read more: Danner Trail 2650 review (men's version)
See the Men's Danner Trail 2650  See the Women's Danner Trail 2650

A Great Minimalist Hiker

9. Men's Xero Shoes Scrambler Low EV & Women's Scrambler Low EV ($160)

Category: Hiking shoe
Weight per pair: 1 lb. 2.4 oz. (men's), 14.8 oz. (women's)
Waterproof: No
What we like: Wide but secure fit, great traction, and a broad toe box.
What we don’t: Heavier than other, more minimalist barefoot designs.

While the slim design, light weight, and sleek aesthetics may draw you to the "barefoot" world of hiking shoes, we feel the need to start reviews of these shoes with a word of caution. You shouldn't jump into hiking (and especially backpacking) with minimalist shoes until you've allowed your feet to properly adjust to the stripped-down design. If you don't, you could risk serious injury. With that behind us, "barefoot" running, hiking, and backpacking, using shoes like these that provide a greater connection to the trail, is rising in popularity. The thin midsole and flexible design allow your feet to bend, move, and flex naturally, adapting to the contours of the trail. In this realm, Xero's Scrambler Low EV is one of our favorite picks. It features rugged Michelin rubber outsoles with 3 mm lugs for solid traction without sacrificing connection to the earth. On top of that, the Scrambler has an incredibly cozy, natural fit with a wide toe box to allow your feet to splay naturally. In testing, we've found these hold up to the rigors of tough trails better than other similar models in our arsenal.

The cons to these types of shoes are fairly obvious, and most have nothing to do with the brand: they offer little support and cushion, and less durability than many other hiking shoes. Specific to the Scrambler Low EV, though, we feel the price is a bit steep for what you get, the included laces aren't our favorites (some folks we know choose to swap them out), and they are a bit heavier than other barefoot shoes. This aside, Xero makes some truly incredible shoes for those looking for a bit more connection to the trails they are trotting on.
See the Men's Xero Shoes Scrambler Low EV  See the Women's Xero Shoes Scrambler Low EV

Another High Cushion Standout

10. Men's Hoka Anacapa 2 Low GTX & Women's Anacapa 2 Low GTX ($180)

Category: Hiking shoe
Weight per pair: 1 lb. 14.6 oz. (men's), 1 lb. 8.8 oz. (women's)
Waterproof: Yes (Gore-Tex)
What we like: Cushy design is extremely comfortable; smooth ride.
What we don’t: Some outsole durability issues, polarizing looks, fit runs big.

For uncompromising comfort with a stable, smooth ride, the Hoka Anacapa takes the cake. The Speedgoat above has achieved legendary status among hikers (specifically the thru-hiking community), but there are some notable trade-offs with the trail running design. For those who want a bit more support and protection, Hoka also offers an impressive lineup of hiking-specific footwear, including the Anacapa 2 Low here. The Anacapa (also available in a mid-height version) features Hoka’s well-known springy midsole, a rockered shape for a smooth ride on the trail, and a beefed-up construction that includes durable nubuck leather and a Gore-Tex waterproof liner. The result is a fast-moving shoe that nicely mixes a trail runner-like feel with the added structure of a hiker.

The Anacapa was updated to the “2” with a focus on more sustainable materials, along with a few noteworthy changes to the midsole and upper. With a less intrusive heel counter, additional tongue padding, and a slightly softer midsole, the 2 is arguably more comfortable than its predecessor, and Hoka also enhanced the toe box for increased durability and protection. However, we were surprised to see that the Vibram Megagrip outsole remains virtually unchanged—like the original, it features large sections of blown rubber that are susceptible to damage from rocky trail use. Additionally, we found it fit slightly larger than the outgoing model (some may need to go down a half size). But the Anacapa 2 remains a solid update to a very good hiking shoe, and it’s especially ideal for those who stick to established trails and prioritize cushy comfort.
Read more: Hoka Anacapa 2 Low GTX review (men's version)
See the Men's Hoka Anacapa 2 Low GTX  See the Women's Hoka Anacapa 2 Low GTX

A Great Trail Runner Hybrid

11. Men's Brooks Cascadia 19 & Women's Cascadia 19 ($150)

Category: Trail runner
Weight per pair: 1 lb. 5.4 oz. (men's), 1 lb. 3.6 oz. (women's)
Waterproof: No (available)
What we like: A classic thru-hiking shoe that offers more stability than the Speedgoat and Lone Peak above.
What we don’t: Heavier than the Speedgoat and less durable than a traditional hiking shoe.

Now in its 19th generation, the Brooks Cascadia is one of the longest-standing trail runners on the market, and it is particularly popular in the thru-hiking community. Like the Speedgoat and Lone Peak above, this shoe bridges the gap for speed-focused hikers, providing the support and protection needed for rugged trails while offering a hefty dose of cushioning for long days out. And, it won’t weigh you down as much as the hiking-specific shoes here. We've tested the Cascadia 19 all over the Canadian Rockies and continue to be impressed by the balanced design: This shoe feels stable and precise while traversing off-camber terrain with a full pack, but remains impressively quick and responsive when running the vehicle shuttle at the end of the trek. The latest 19 features a more abrasion-resistant mesh upper and additional recycled content, and it's lighter than the outgoing 18. 

How does the Cascadia compare with another darling of the thru-hiking world, the Altra Lone Peak? Both offer a nice array of trail-ready features, such as aggressive rubber outsoles. However, the Brooks is the more technically capable option, with additional cushioning and protection underfoot, as well as better overall stability. In terms of fit, both feature roomy toe boxes that are great for accommodating swollen toes (though the Altra is more spacious), but the Cascadia locks things down more at the midfoot and heel. A final key difference is the Cascadia’s 6-millimeter drop compared to the Lone Peak's zero-drop shape, which lends a more agile and quick overall feel (although the “natural” profile of the Altra is a big reason it has such a loyal following). Ultimately, we think the Brooks is the better all-rounder for most hikers, although the Altra edges it out for those with particularly finicky feet. 
See the Men's Brooks Cascadia 19  See the Women's Brooks Cascadia 19

A Classic Everyday Hiker

12. Men's Keen Targhee IV Vent & Women's Targhee IV Vent ($160)

Category: Hiking shoe
Weight per pair: 2 lb. 2.2 oz. (men's), 1 lb. 14 oz. (women's)
Waterproof: No (available)
What we like: Cushioned and comfortable with above-average build quality.
What we don’t: Pricier than the Merrell Moab, subpar traction on wet surfaces, and the heaviest option on our list.

Like Merrell's Moab, the Targhee is Keen's signature everyday hiker. Recently updated, the changes weren't groundbreaking but did a nice job improving overall durability while retaining a lot of what we loved about past versions. This includes a generous but not sloppy toe box, solid all-day comfort, and a fairly responsive feel (for a burly leather hiker, that is). The Targhee IV still won’t be confused with an aggressive model like the Salomon X Ultra above—in looks or performance—but its tough leather construction and well-cushioned interior make it a great casual hiking shoe.

Among day hiking options, the Keen Targhee and Merrell Moab 3 above are two of the most popular on the market. Both are very comfortable right out of the box, offer sufficient support for non-technical trails, and can even do the trick on shorter backpacking trips. In parsing out the differences, the Targhee IV's outsole is a step down in all-around traction, especially on slick terrain like wet rocks. On the flip side, the Targhee's nubuck leather upper is a little more durable than the Moab’s mesh-heavy build, but the Targhee isn’t as good a value at $160 (the waterproof version is even pricier). The price difference and slippery outsole are enough to push it down our list, but the Targhee’s standout comfort and toughness make it a consistent favorite. And a final note: Our female tester wished she had gone down half a size in the latest Targhee IV, and other reviews confirm that sizing runs on the bigger end.
See the Men's Keen Targhee IV Vent  See the Women's Keen Targhee IV Vent

A Great Budget Alternative

13. Men's Oboz Sawtooth X Low & Women's Sawtooth X Low ($140)

Category: Hiking shoe
Weight per pair: 1 lb. 15.6 oz. (men's), 1 lb. 11.2 oz. (women's)
Waterproof: No (available)
What we like: A modern update to a much-loved classic.
What we don’t: Pricier and less breathable than the Moab 3 above.

Based in Bozeman, Montana, Oboz has a reputation for crafting tough, comfort-first footwear at a lower price point compared to much of the competition. The Sawtooth has long been one of their most popular models for both day hiking and overnights. Responding to the resounding movement toward lighter and more nimble footwear, the X version of the Sawtooth features a modernized aesthetic and a refined fit, along with added Cordura for enhanced abrasion resistance. However, the original formula remains largely the same, featuring a roomy toe box and plush interior, Oboz’s supportive O Fit insole, and a durable construction that can withstand mile after mile of trail abuse.

What’s not to like about the Sawtooth X? Despite Oboz’s efforts toward streamlining the design, it’s still a fairly heavy shoe and less agile than most. And with a leather upper and plush cushioning, its breathability suffers compared to the lighter, mesh-heavy hikers above. When comparing the Sawtooth X and Moab 3 side by side, the Merrell is less expensive and offers better ventilation, while the Oboz is slightly lighter and provides more durability by way of Cordura in the upper. It’s also hard to find fault with the Sawtooth X’s fit, which is built to accommodate medium-to-high-volume feet and has a very minimal break-in period. And lastly, the Sawtooth X also comes in a low-top waterproof model ($165) and waterproof and non-waterproof versions of a mid-height boot.
See the Men's Oboz Sawtooth X Low  See the Women's Oboz Sawtooth X Low

Hiking Shoe Comparison Table

About Our Testing Process

The Switchback Travel team is no stranger to long days on the trail. From epic high routes traversing striking peaks to months-long thru-hikes across the country, we clock serious miles each year on all sorts of terrain. Former editor-in-chief John Ellings drew from his experience on local trails in the Pacific Northwest and far-flung expeditions to southern Patagonia (and beyond) to curate our initial selection of 12 hiking shoes back in 2015. Senior editor Chris Carter took over the guide in 2024, with input from the entire team. A seasoned thru-hiker, Chris has completed the Triple Crown of long trails in the U.S. (AT, PCT, and CDT) and continues to backpack and explore around the world. He's worn well-earned holes in more hiking shoes than he can count and knows the importance of solid kicks for tackling any trail.

We meticulously tested dozens of highly rated hiking shoes to narrow down the selection of 13 models above, drawing on personal experiences as well as feedback from seasoned contributors and the broader hiking community. Weight, durability, breathability, and cushioning are all key factors we consider when evaluating the performance of a hiking shoe, and each design had to prove itself over grueling miles to earn a spot in this roundup. Finally, we recognize that the hiking shoe market is continually evolving. As a result, we stay informed about new products as they emerge, adding standouts to our list along the way and ensuring our existing reviews remain up-to-date. And if you're looking for a different style of hiking footwear, we took a similar approach in putting together our lists of the best hiking boots and best trail running shoes.
 

Hiking Shoe Buying Advice

• Hiking Footwear Categories
• Weight
• Stability and Support
• Waterproofing
• Breathability
• Lacing Systems
• Hiking Shoe "Upper" Materials
• Midsoles and Cushioning
• Outsoles and Traction
• Toe Protection
• Insoles
• Hiking Shoes vs. Hiking Boots​
   

Hiking Footwear Categories​

Hiking Shoes
For the vast majority of day hikers, and even a good number of backpackers and thru-hikers, a hiking shoe that falls just below the ankle is the perfect match. Shoes like the Salomon X Ultra 5 GTX are stiffer and more substantial than a trail runner for carrying a light load over mixed terrain but don't feel draggingly heavy like a full-on boot. Furthermore, hiking shoes often have a tougher construction than trail runners, with increased use of leather and durable nylon as opposed to mesh. Protection from obstacles like rocks and roots comes courtesy of rubber toe caps and medium-stiff midsoles. Hiking shoes are also great options for folks needing a substantial shoe for daily wear—just be mindful that the outsoles will wear faster on pavement.
 

Trail Running Shoes
If speed is paramount, consider a trail runner. Shoes like the Altra Lone Peak and Hoka Speedgoat have gained significant popularity over the past few years as the ultimate lightweight options and are a common sight on thru-hikes like the PCT and AT. That said, keep in mind that these types of shoes are not traditional off-trail or backpacking footwear. Trail runners are flexible and super comfortable, but they don’t provide much in the way of ankle support when you’re carrying a heavy load and generally have minimal toe and underfoot protection. For hikes on established trails or for experienced minimalist trekkers, however, a trail runner remains an excellent option. We’ve included a couple of great hybrid trail running and hiking options in this article, but for a complete breakdown, see our round-up of the best trail running shoes. And for a deeper dive into the differences, check out our article on Hiking Shoes vs. Trail Runners.
 

Approach Shoes
The third option has a relatively narrow focus: climbers or hikers who need a grippy shoe to tackle steep and rocky terrain. Many rock climbers will use an approach shoe on the hike in (hence the “approach” in the name) and switch to a true climbing shoe when the terrain becomes vertical. Approach shoes are easy to spot: They have a large toe rand and a sticky, low-profile rubber compound underfoot for maximum grip on rock. The shoes can be plenty comfortable on day hikes, especially a crossover style like the La Sportiva TX4 Evo, but aren’t what we typically recommend as a daily driver or backpacking pick—though one of our editors does know someone who hiked the entire AT in TX4s. The tread isn't as secure on soft surfaces like mud, and approach shoes generally aren't as comfortable underfoot for long trail days. If, however, your day hikes include a lot of scrambling or low-grade rock climbing, an approach shoe is an excellent choice.
 

Weight

Arguably, the most significant development in modern hiking shoe technology is the shift toward lightweight designs. Tough but thin fabrics and a shift from over-the-ankle boots to low-top shoes have made putting on major miles a lot easier. It’s no surprise that most thru-hikers now choose a hiking shoe over a traditional leather boot. Most of the shoes on our list weigh 2 pounds or less for a pair—by comparison, a backpacking boot like the Asolo TPS 520 GV Evo tips the scales at around 4 pounds. And on your feet, the weight is even more apparent. True, the drop in ounces can sometimes impact long-term durability, but there are still a number of compelling hiking boots available for traditionalists and those who need extra support. For most, a lightweight shoe is a much better companion for day hikes, peak bagging, and minimalist overnight trips. As long as the rest of your gear is equally light, there are very few sacrifices. For those truly hoping to shave weight, something like the minimalist Xero Shoes Scrambler offers an unprecedented "barefoot" like connection with the trail in a light, packable design.
 

Stability and Support

As a reflection of the push for lighter gear in all facets, hiking shoes are shifting away from the traditional stiff construction of hiking boots in favor of flexibility and a nimble feel. All hiking footwear (excluding some minimalist trail runners) retains a degree of stiffness due to built-in shanks or internal supports. These features are part of what separates a hiking shoe (and approach shoe) from a super-flexible cross-trainer or road-running shoe.
 

For day hikes on flatter or less technical terrain, we can’t recommend a lightweight and semi-flexible hiking shoe enough. Shoes like the Merrell Moab 3 and Keen Targhee IV Vent are standouts for these uses. As your trips get longer and your pack gets heavier, a more substantial shoe still wins out for us. Look to the Salomon X Ultra 5 as a great all-around option that is equally adept at conquering summit peaks and multi-day backpacking.
 

Waterproofing

Once you narrow your hiking footwear search, you may be considering the Gore-Tex question: Do you really need waterproofing? In theory, a waterproof design is a nice security blanket if you’ll be hiking in the mountains. The extra protection that comes with a waterproof and breathable membrane inserted into the shoe is great for creek crossings, surprise rainfall, or if you hit snow on an early-season trek. However, the extra layer adds weight and significantly impacts breathability (discussed below), and the designs aren’t always perfect. We’ve found Gore-Tex (also often referred to as 'GTX') models to work consistently well, and many in-house designs perform similarly at keeping water out (breathability is a different story), including the Oboz Sawtooth's B-Dry technology.
 

Whether or not you need waterproofing often comes down to a personal choice. Are you a summer-only hiker or live in a warm and dry area? We’d recommend a non-waterproof shoe in most cases, and some of the best-ventilating shoes are the Altra Lone Peak 9 and Merrell Moab 3. But if you get into the alpine regions or would benefit from the added protection and modest insulation waterproofing provides, we’d lean the other way. The great news is that most shoes on our list are offered in both varieties. Expect to pay about $20 to $30 more for the addition of waterproofing. To dive deeper, check out our roundup of the best waterproof hiking shoes.
 

Breathability

The truth about waterproof liners, even expensive Gore-Tex booties, is that they don’t breathe well—just as a waterproof jacket won’t be as breathable as a comparable non-waterproof version. Simply put, waterproof and breathable membranes restrict a shoe’s ability to pull moisture away from your sweaty feet as efficiently as a non-waterproof upper. Not all non-waterproof shoes should be treated equally, however. Footwear featuring thinner fabrics and a lot of mesh will increase moisture transfer and airflow, keeping feet less sweaty in hot weather and drying out soggy hiking socks far more quickly.
 

Gore-Tex Surround, which is designed to bring 360 degrees of breathability by venting out the insole of the shoe, is an intriguing—if expensive—concept. It’s been well received in a few models, including the La Sportiva Spire, but performance will always fall short of a shoe made mostly of mesh (for more, see our in-depth Spire review). Regardless of your final decision, we encourage you to consider non-waterproof footwear before selecting your next pair of hiking shoes.
 

Lacing Systems

Easily overlooked, laces—as well as the system of hooks and eyelets—play an essential role in fit and comfort. If a shoe has a poor lacing system that is prone to loosening, you’ll find yourself having to readjust constantly on the trail. If the system itself doesn’t secure your heel very well, the up-and-down walking motion will create hot spots and blisters. If the culprit is just the laces themselves, it’s an easy fix: there are a number of quality replacement laces available. But if the system doesn’t hold your foot very well, we recommend looking elsewhere.
 

Some models, including the Salomon X Ultra 5, have a single-pull lacing system. The design is highly convenient, and we’ve had no more issues with durability than we've experienced with traditional laces. One thing to keep in mind, however, is that you aren’t able to adjust the fit between eyelets, so the shoe will be equally tight across the entire foot. Those with finicky feet that need to fine-tune their laces to be comfortable may be best served by avoiding quick-lace designs.
 

Hiking Shoe "Upper" Materials

Hiking shoe upper material is not the most exciting topic, but examining the construction can provide helpful insights into a shoe's performance. The type of material used will directly correlate with a shoe's durability, water resistance, and breathability. Most often, hiking and trail shoes are made from a combination of nylon, mesh, and leather to strike a balance between cost and longevity. Below, we outline the pros and cons of the most common materials used in hiking footwear.

Synthetic Nylon and Mesh
Woven synthetic (often nylon) as well as open synthetic mesh panels are commonly used to aid breathability. These materials are not as well known for their durability, but they do a great job of cutting weight. Some of our favorite models with durable but lightweight synthetic mesh for standout breathability include Hoka's Speedgoat 6 and Altra's Lone Peak 9—both of which have accompanied us on multiple months-long thru-hikes and international backpacking trips. 
 

Nubuck Leather
Made of full-grain leather, but given a brushed finish that has a suede-like feel, nubuck leather is a common sight on heavier-duty hiking shoes. The softer-touch leather is lighter and more flexible than traditional, glossy full-leather options and more durable than most nylons. It does fall short in breathability, however. As a result, it’s common to find a mix of leather and nylon mesh for abrasion resistance and breathability, as seen on shoes like the Merrell Moab and Keen Targhee Vent. Hoka's Anacapa 2 Low GTX also features a recycled mesh upper crisscrossed with nubuck leather overlays, which boosts durability while still affording decent breathability—a tricky balance for waterproof shoes.
 

Midsoles and Cushioning

Digging a little deeper into the shoe's construction, we'll look at midsole construction next. Its importance lies in cushioning your feet, working as a shock absorber from impacts, and providing an additional layer of protection from sharp rocks. Depending on the design, midsoles vary from very thin (minimalist trail runner) to stiff and substantial (burly hiking shoe). Most include EVA, TPU, or a combination of both in their construction.

EVA
Foam EVA midsoles are a common sight on running and hiking footwear. The cushy soft material takes some of the sting out of your heel or midfoot impacts and is also extremely lightweight. While nearly all shoes on this list utilize some form of EVA, the proprietary versions can vary from extremely soft to mildly stiff. For logging serious miles on tougher terrain, we prefer a firm and supportive midsole over excessive cushioning. Those overly soft midsoles also have a tendency to break down over time, much like a road-running shoe. Generally, you pay more for an enhanced midsole design and a higher-quality EVA compound.
 

TPU
Thermoplastic polyurethane (mercifully shortened to TPU) is a durable plastic commonly found in performance-oriented light hikers. Shoes that use TPU underfoot are often less cushy than those with only EVA, but will last longer and better handle a heavier load. Additionally, they’ll retain their shape longer and are less prone to compressing compared to EVA. Because both midsole types have valid applications and TPU is more expensive, it’s common for a manufacturer to use a TPU frame or shank for stability and toughness and add in EVA underfoot to increase comfort.
 

Outsoles and Traction

One of the primary reasons to upgrade from a flimsy cross-trainer to a true hiking shoe is for improved traction. In a way that more casual footwear can never match, hiking and trail running footwear is leaps and bounds better when the going gets rocky, slippery, and steep. In much the same way that Gore-Tex dominates the market for mid- to high-end waterproofing, Vibram occupies a similar niche for outsoles. Their name is synonymous with solid grip and traction on a variety of terrain, and Vibram rubber is incredibly durable compared to other compounds we've tested. Not all Vibram models should be treated as equals, however, as the rubber manufacturer tailors its designs for specific footwear and brands. Some have much larger lugs underfoot for serious grip in mud, and others prioritize sticky rubber for scrambling over rocks. There are also more entry-level options that just do well on easier trails, like the lugs you’ll find on the bottom of the Merrell Moab 3 boots and shoes.
 

Salomon is one brand that doesn’t outsource their traction needs. Instead, they use their in-house Contagrip compound for all of their hiking and trail running models. We’ve found the level of quality and performance is in line with Vibram offerings across the board, from their fast-and-light X Ultra hiking shoes to the burly Quest 4 backpacking boots.
 

Toe Protection

Hiking trails, even well-maintained ones, are full of rocks, roots, and other potential hazards, so we almost always recommend a hiking shoe with some type of toe cap. Lacking any protection on the front of your shoes can lead to a trip-ruining impact when you inevitably look up from the trail to enjoy the scenery. Hiking shoes typically have a full rubber toe cap, but trail runners sometimes have a trimmed-down version or none at all—one of the compromises in opting for a minimalist shoe. Approach shoes, on the other hand, have exceptional toe protection with their wraparound rubber rand at the front of the shoe.
 

Insoles

Just like with running shoes, the stock insoles that come with nearly every hiking shoe are generally cheap. For some, this might not make a difference, but for others, it’s what separates comfort from misery. Thankfully, removing your insoles is extremely easy, and replacing them with an aftermarket model that’s specifically designed for your foot size and shape can remedy most shoe maladies. New insoles can provide more or less volume to fill out the shoe, improve fit under the arch, and increase or decrease cushion and shock absorption. We recommend checking out Superfeet insoles for their wide selection of options and trusted reputation in daily shoes, ski boots, and hiking footwear as a whole.
 

Hiking Shoes vs. Hiking Boots

Perhaps the biggest point of differentiation between hiking shoes and boots is height: Shoes have a low-top fit, while boots generally sit above the ankle. Hiking shoes excel on smooth trails, where rolled ankles are less likely to occur (if you keep your pack weight down), and for those who want to move quickly with less on their feet. Tradition suggests that hiking boots are the better choice for carrying heavy packs and navigating rough trails, and in most cases, that remains true today. The tall height, along with laces that hold the boot snugly around your ankle, offers a more secure fit, greater stability, and added protection. That said, with enough practice and trail time, hikers can build up ankle strength in low-top shoes and remain quite safe traversing the same terrain that they would in boots. Given the choice, we most often select a hiking shoe for its lightweight and agile feel; however, both are viable options for day hiking, backpacking, and non-alpine peak bagging. 
 

In 2025 and beyond, we see the lines between hiking shoe and boot categories continuing to blur. They still will be separated by height—although some modern boots only cover part of the ankle—but fewer and fewer boots resemble the heavyweight leather clunkers of old. One example is the over-the-ankle version of the Salomon X Ultra 5. It’s the same basic shoe with the same defining characteristics—feathery feel, aggressive stance, and supportive fit—but the “Mid” sits slightly higher on the ankle, weighs a couple more ounces, and provides a boost in protection and support (it also offers a traditional lacing system instead of the Quicklace system). Since most folks stick to defined trails, the push for this type of fast-and-light footwear will continue to dominate the market.
Back to Our Top Hiking Shoe Picks  Back to Our Hiking Shoe Comparison Table