Best Trail Running Shoes of 2025

Running on varied, challenging trails is a welcome break from the monotony of pounding pavement or the dreaded treadmill. Better yet, trail running requires minimal gear. Our team has logged miles in all four seasons across the US to bring you our favorites, which range from flexible, lightweight shoes for smooth trails to rugged designs for tackling mountainous terrain. The Salomon S/Lab Pulsar 4 took the top spot this year, thanks to its agility on technical routes and comfort over long distances. For more background information on the rest of our top trail runners, check out our comparison table and buying advice, along with details about our testing process.

Editor's note: We updated this guide on Dec 6, 2025, to add the La Sportiva Prodigio Max, Salomon S/Lab Ultra Glide, On Cloudultra 3, and Hoka Mafate X. We removed several discontinued and underperforming models, updated the Brooks Cascadia to the latest edition, and added notes and photos from the past several months of testing.  We also added a tested-and-dismissed section, and we swept the guide to ensure all information was current at the time of publication.
 

Our Team's Trail Running Shoe Picks

• Best Overall Trail Running Shoe: Salomon S/Lab Pulsar 4
• Best Budget Trail Running Shoe: Brooks Divide 5
• Best Max-Cushioned Trail Running Shoe: Hoka Speedgoat 6
• Best Light and Responsive Trail Runner: Brooks Catamount 4
• Most Versatile Trail Running Shoe: Saucony Peregrine 15
• Best Trail Runner for Wide and/or Finicky Feet: Altra Lone Peak 9
• Best Running Shoe for Mountain Terrain: La Sportiva Bushido III
• Best Shoe for Wet and Sloppy Conditions: Salomon Speedcross 6
• Our Other Favorite Trail Running Shoes

Best Overall Trail Running Shoe

1. Salomon S/Lab Pulsar 4 ($220)

Weight: 1 lb. 1.6 oz. (unisex)
Cushioning: 34mm heel / 28mm toe
Drop: 6mm
What we like: A nimble, performance-oriented shoe with a locked-in fit and excellent traction.
What we don’t: Expensive; runs long.

The Salomon S/Lab Pulsar 4 blew us away this year with its agile footing, excellent traction, and lightweight, breathable build. Built in conjunction with Salomon athletes, the Pulsar 4 is the trail runner we reach for when we want to tackle long miles on technical terrain. This is a secure, reliable shoe that feels stable from ankle collar to platform, and has a close fit that moves with our feet without feeling pinched. The tongue doesn't shift, and the ankle cutouts are just deep enough to prevent bruising, while still high enough for a locked-in fit with ankle support. The Pulsar has a fairly lean upper without any overlays (keeping the weight low and the fit sleek), but the angled side shank helps maintain anterior stability on off-camber trails, something other lightweight shoes lack.

The trick is getting this shoe to fit correctly. The Pulsar 4 feels incredibly secure and comfortable, but our testers had trouble getting the correct sizing for this unisex model, and both ended up dropping down a half size. Aside from the price, the fit issues were our only gripe with the Pulsar 4. But if you're willing to shell out money for an incredibly precise, high-performing shoe, we trust this one on everything from shale-covered trails to steep dirt mountainsides. It's light, airy, incredibly responsive, has excellent traction, and is absolutely dialed once you figure out the sizing. 
Read more: Salomon S/Lab Pulsar 4 review
See the Unisex Salomon S/Lab Pulsar 4
 

Best Budget Trail Running Shoe

2. Men's Brooks Divide 5 & Women's Brooks Divide 5 ($110)

Weight: 1 lb. 5 oz. (men's), 1 lb. 1.8 oz. (women's)
Cushioning: 24mm heel / 16mm toe
Drop: 8mm
What we like: Nice go-between for trail and road; great price; excellent breathability.
What we don’t: On the bulkier and stiffer side, not super peppy for fast runs.

The Brooks Divide 5 is an approachable and affordable shoe, but it punches above its weight class. Marketed as a road/trail hybrid, the Divide has performed admirably for us on every surface, though it excels on moderate trails. The 25% recycled TrailTack Green outsoles expertly handle steep slopes on loose dirt and gravel, and the grip on slick rocks makes stream crossings easier and decidedly less nerve-wracking. The 5 has a slipper-like feel and impressive breathability, and despite the .6-ounce gain over the 4, it remains mid-range for trail-shoe weight. It has a road-type fit with moderate 3mm lugs, and the upper is made from an air mesh that breathes like a performance road shoe. 

The Divide can feel a bit clunky on roads, but as a transitional shoe for varied terrain, it is more than adequate. That said, while it handles slower paces like a dream, it struggles when trying to pick up speed—it isn't the kick to choose to try to PR your next 5K. Additionally, if you are a more advanced runner, the lack of feedback on technical terrain and the inability to build speed will be the biggest detractors. But for those newer to trail running or who prefer less technical trails, the Divide 5 does everything it sets out to do. This is a versatile shoe that feels tacky on trails but isn't overkill on roads, and, as far as trail shoes go, it's the only more affordable option we trust. The updated Divide 6 is currently unavailable in the US, and we will update this listing once we've tested the new version.
See the Men's Brooks Divide 5  See the Women's Brooks Divide 5
 

Best Max-Cushioned Trail Running Shoe

3. Men's Hoka Speedgoat 6 & Women's Speedgoat 6 ($155)

Weight: 1 lb. 3.6 oz. (men's), 1 lb. 0.4 oz. (women's)
Cushioning: 40mm heel / 35mm toe
Drop: 5mm
What we like: Standout comfort and traction in a lightweight package.
What we don’t: A thick midsole minimizes trail feel in technical sections.

Hoka has built its reputation around plush, heavily cushioned running shoes, and the latest Speedgoat 6 is a nice upgrade to the popular design. With a thick midsole (40mm at the heel), the shoe offers maximum long-distance comfort and underfoot protection, absorbing a nice amount of impact with each stride. But there’s a lot more to love about the design: In our opinion, the Speedgoat hits a near-ideal balance of comfort, weight, protection, and responsiveness, whether you’re running short or far, fast or slow. The aggressive outsole is light but sticky with substantial lugs (improved from previous editions), blown rubber, and a Vibram Megagrip compound that holds well on everything from dry dirt and mud to steep rock. Tack on a medium-width toe box that fits a broad range of foot shapes, and it’s no secret why the Speedgoat has garnered such popularity over the years.

However, while the latest Speedgoat offers better stability and durability than previous models, it comes at the cost of less cushion and "spring"—one of the primary reasons many turn to Hoka. We've also found the 6 to be narrower around the toe box and less breathable due to the abrasion-resistant upper. Finally, we wish the tongue were a little longer—we didn't have this issue with the 5, but the tongue on our 6 barely extends past the laces and can get sucked partway underneath if you're not careful. On a fun note, Hoka knows some recent Speedgoat updates weren't a fan favorite, so, in a rare industry decision, they rereleased the iconic Speedgoat 2 for a limited time, including the previous version's fit, materials, colorways, and the secure, locked-in feel we loved a few years back.  
Read more: Hoka Speedgoat 6 review, Hoka Speedgoat 2 review
See the Men's Hoka Speedgoat 6  See the Women's Hoka Speedgoat 6
 

Best Light and Responsive Trail Runner

4. Men's Brooks Catamount 4 & Women's Catamount 4 ($170)

Weight: 1 lb. 3.0 oz. (men's), 1 lb. 1.0 oz. (women's)
Cushioning: 34mm heel / 28mm toe
Drop: 6mm
What we like: A lightweight shoe that can tackle both easy and technical trails at speed.
What we don't: Some ultra-distance runners will want more cushion and support.

Brooks is best known in the trail running world for its Cascadia, but the modernized Catamount 4 offers a lighter, more nimble take on the trail, built to tackle moderate distances at speed. Imported from Brooks’ Hyperion Tempo road shoe, the carbon-like DNA Flash v2 midsole is lightweight and responsive, offering a snappy underfoot feel ideal for pushing the pace and precision on tricky sections of trail. Another highlight is the SkyVault v2 propulsion plate, which protects your feet from rocks and boosts efficiency on the uphill. Whether you’re cruising gravel roads or going to battle on technical terrain, the Catamount is one speedy shoe to have on your team.

With last year's revamp, the Catamount 4 adds a 0.2 oz. per pair to the prior version while also incorporating more recycled materials from previous iterations. Brooks also tweaked the upper fit for added comfort over long distances, though we'd still recommend sticking to about 50K or less at a time, since this shoe has less padding than max-cushioned models. The Catamount hits a versatile middle ground between speed-oriented shoes like and more rugged trail runners, and while it isn't the absolute lightest on our list, it has an excellent combination of security and protection at a low weight. You get a more substantial outsole than the On Cloudultra 3 for better performance on technical trails, but a zippier and more locked-in feel than the Brooks Cascadia. For a high-performance, race-day-oriented shoe that can do it all, this is a solid option.
See the Men's Brooks Catamount 4  See the Women's Brooks Catamount 4
 

Most Versatile Trail Running Shoe

5. Men's Saucony Peregrine 15 & Women's Peregrine 15 ($145)

Weight: 1 lb. 3.4 oz. (men's), 1 lb. 1.2 oz (women's)
Cushioning:  28mm heel / 24mm toe
Drop: 4mm
What we like: Updated fit is secure without constriction; excellent heel lock.
What we don’t: The moderate cushion might not be enough for long-distance runners used to a max-cushioned shoe.

The Peregrine is Saucony's most popular and versatile trail shoe, and recent updates shot the 15 into our top picks this year. The forefoot and toe box have a secure, accurate fit without constriction, and the heel lock is excellent even on tight corners and bouncy descents. The updated outsole rubber kept us stable on everything from loose, slippery rocks to soft dirt and stayed secure when the going got wet. The 4-millimeter drop is subtle enough to promote forward propulsion without losing your natural stride, and the fit is confidence-inspiring without an aggressively tight wrap. We found the mesh upper to be both breathable and abrasion-resistant, and the shoe is responsive over long distances thanks to Saucony's medium-density Pwrrun foam, which we love in their road-running shoes.

We don't have many gripes with the comfort, fit, and performance of the newest Peregrine. This is an incredibly versatile shoe for everything from longer days to run-hike combos, and it still feels peppy and responsive during faster runs on gravel or moderate trails. If anything, competitive ultrarunners might prefer more cushion in the La Sportiva Prodigio Max. But the recent fit updates solved our tight forefoot issues with the previous version, and the shoe's locked-in feel, stable traction, and reasonable price are hard to beat. If anything, we recommend wearing a sock with at least a 3-inch cuff, as the Peregrine's heel tab is a little tall and can rub with shorter socks.
See the Men's Saucony Peregrine 15  See the Saucony Women's Peregrine 15
 

Best Trail Runner for Wide and/or Finicky Feet

6. Men's Altra Lone Peak 9 & Women's Lone Peak 9 ($145)

Weight: 1 lb. 6.4 oz. (men's), 1 lb. 2.6 oz (women's)
Cushioning: 25mm heel/toe
Drop: 0mm
What we like: A comfortable shoe that allows the foot to lie in its natural position; lighter than the prior version.
What we don’t: Sluggish, slipper-like feel; too roomy for some.

If you’re among the myriad trail runners who suffer from pressure points, bunions, and blisters resulting from ill-fitting shoes, this one’s for you. Popularized by the barefoot running movement, Altra’s zero-drop Lone Peak is one of the most ergonomic and comfortable trail runners out there. With a flat footbed and extra roomy toe box, the Lone Peak allows the foot to lie in its naturally prone and splayed position, which is great news for wide-footed runners or those with particularly finicky feet. We’ve recommended this shoe to dozens of friends and acquaintances who’ve struck out with more traditional shoes (including wide versions of models like the Hoka Speedgoat) and have yet to lead anyone astray. 

Altra added a more abrasion-resistant ripstop mesh upper for the 9, and improved traction with an upgraded MaxTrac outsole. They also rolled out a Lone Peak 9+, which includes a Vibram outsole for $15 more. True to its trail-worthy intentions, the Lone Peak retains a rock plate and gaiter attachments. That said, the zero-drop design isn't for everyone, and those accustomed to a more traditional trail runner might find the Lone Peak sluggish, under-cushioned, and lacking in arch support. It can feel a little dead during faster runs, and the standard model's rubber wears out much faster than we'd like. For runners looking for another zero-drop option for finicky feet, we've also appreciated the Flux Adapt's generous fit and increased durability over the Altra Lone Peak, though the Lone Peak's reliability and line options kept it on the list for this year.
Read more: Altra Lone Peak 8 review
See the Men's Altra Lone Peak 9  See the Women's Altra Lone Peak 9
 

Best Running Shoe for Mountain Terrain

7. Men's La Sportiva Bushido III & Women's Bushido III ($160)

Weight: 1 lb. 5.2 oz. (men's), 1 lb. 1.6 oz (women's)
Cushioning:  19mm heel / 13mm toe
Drop: 6mm
What we like: A superb technical shoe with awesome traction.
What we don’t: Too much grip and not enough cushion for high-mileage outings and daily training.

Today's mountain athletes don’t think twice about taking on technical challenges with nothing more than a pair of running shoes and a day’s worth of supplies, and many of our go-to shoes come from climbing specialist La Sportiva. Their versatile Bushido III is a perennial favorite and excels on all manner of terrain, from soggy trails and snow to fifth-class rock and loose talus. Grippy FriXion rubber (a compound used on some of La Sportiva’s climbing shoes) gives you solid traction while scrambling, and the hardy tread grips remarkably well on soft terrain without being too overbuilt for firm ground. Tack on a durable upper with recently updated increased breathability, plus a protective toe cap and rock guard under the forefoot, and the Bushido is a confidence-inspiring workhorse of a shoe.

Compared to the Speedcross 6, the Bushido III has more versatile intentions for a variety of on- and off-trail terrain. Further, mountain runners will love the shoe’s low stack height (19mm in the heel compared to the Speedcross’s 32mm), which lends stability and a solid ground feel. But this performance does end up feeling overkill on smooth paths, and the Bushido’s lightly cushioned midsole is less comfortable than all-around models like the Speedgoat or Pulsar 4, especially on high-mileage days. Still, for technical missions that demand high precision and a reliable grip, the Bushido is hard to beat.
Read more: La Sportiva Bushido III review (women's version)
See the Men's La Sportiva Bushido III  See the Women's La Sportiva Bushido III
 

Best Shoe for Wet and Sloppy Conditions

8. Men's Salomon Speedcross 6 & Women's Salomon Speedcross 6 ($145) 

Weight: 1 lb. 5.0 oz. (men's), 1 lb. 2.5 oz. (women's)
Cushioning:  32mm heel / 22mm toe
Drop: 10mm
What we like: Truly excellent traction on soft ground.
What we don’t: Not versatile for easy trails or most mountain running.

When it comes to soft terrain like mud and snow, you'll want a full rubber outsole like the Salomon Speedcross. With relatively long, widely spaced lugs, this shoe bites into the ground with each step and feels more secure than trail runners with a combination of foam and rubber on the outsole. The trail-eating Speedcross 6 sets the standard in this category, combining 5-millimeter arrow-shaped lugs and a supportive and snug-fitting upper for impressive control at speed. Tack on a stiff midsole, single-pull lace system, and sturdy yet light chassis, and you get one of the most capable trail designs, whether your run takes you over snow, sand, or wet leaves and thick mud.

The latest Speedcross features a revamped upper and outsole at a lower weight than its predecessor. This design feels the most well-rounded of all the past models—you don’t get that tippy feeling we’ve found with previous versions, and the shoe holds its own on short stretches of pavement. That said, the Speedcross is by no means a generalist, and most runners will find its tooth-like lugs and aggressive build to be overkill on easy trails and gravel roads. The stiff underfoot feel dropped it a few slots this year, and the shoe lacks the cushioned rebound we've come to expect in today's trail shoes. But for wet and rugged forest paths, the Speedcross 6 is incredibly purpose-built, even down to details like the anti-debris mesh upper and gusseted tongue. 
Read more: Salomon Speedcross 6 review
See the Men's Salomon Speedcross 6  See the Women's Salomon Speedcross 6
 
 

Our Other Favorite Trail Running Shoes

Best Combination of Cushion and Energy Return 

9. Men's La Sportiva Prodigio Max & Women's Prodigio Max ($185)

Weight: 1 lb. 4.8 oz. (men's), 1 lb. 2.1 oz. (women's)
Cushioning: 37mm heel, 31mm toe
Drop: 6mm
What we like: Excellent rebound with a solid upper wrap and underfoot protection.
What we don’t: The tall stack reduces some ground feel; a little tough to get the sizing right.

The original, ultralight Prodigio has been a well-loved trail shoe for the past few years, and the Prodigio Max's recent addition to the line adds security to the upper and cushion to the midsole without losing the nimble feel of the original. The Max's underfoot spring has a road-shoe feel, which makes sense given La Sportiva's use of a nitrogen-infused EVA midsole similar to performance-oriented road models like the Brooks Glycerin or Saucony Endorphin line. Here, La Sportiva uses a dual-density foam for the midsole core and support, helping keep the foot plantar-flexed without adding stiffness. The rebound is quick and light, and despite the 37-millimeter heel stack, they have a confidence-inducing landing zone on everything from steep, loose dirt to chaotic rock piles. 

At 1 pound 4.8 ounces for the men's pair, this shoe is midrange for trail-shoe weight, which is impressive given its max-cushioned design. Despite this relatively low weight-to-cushion, some runners might find the thick cushioning too high off the ground for a trail shoe and will prefer the lighter build of the Brooks Catamount 4. However, we've been impressed by the comfort and stability of the Prodigio Max this season, and the shoe has excellent durability thanks to the TPU additions and the abrasion-resistant upper. These shoes were an immediate addition to our list after testing, and are an excellent option for runners looking for an energetic shoe that doesn't compromise on protection and stability. We recommend trying on La Sportiva before buying, as the European sizing doesn't always align perfectly with the US sizing. 
See the Men's La Sportiva Prodigio Max  See the Women's La Sportiva Prodigio Max
 

A Versatile, Comfortable Classic

10. Men's Brooks Cascadia 19 & Women's Cascadia 19 ($150)

Weight: 1 lb. 5.4 oz. (men's), 1 lb. 3.6 oz. (women's)
Cushioning: 35mm heel, 29mm toe
Drop: 6mm
What we like: A wonderfully comfortable and versatile shoe.
What we don't: Overbuilt for a daily trainer.

Now in its 19th iteration, the Brooks Cascadia is one of the longest-standing trail runners, and for good reason. This is a shoe that can do it all, with the traction and protection you need for rugged trails, along with a hefty dose of cushioning for long days out. The updated model reduced the drop from 8 millimeters to 6, while the cushion increased from 33 / 25 millimeters 35 / 29 millimeters. This gives the 19 a bump in ground protection without losing the rebound we love from the energetic, nitrogen-infused midsole.

The latest Cascadia also got a much-needed silhouette update, giving it a modernized look and better colorways than the past few iterations. The taller stack and reduced drop give it a more natural feel underfoot while amping up the cushioning. Overall, it's a precise, secure do-it-all shoe. That said, the Cascadia can't match the speed or light weight of some of the top models here—it's still a version of a shoe that debuted in 2004, and no amount of modernizing updates will change that. But it's an excellent all-arounder, doubling as a capable hiking or backpacking shoe, and an easy fit that works for a range of foot types and gait cycles. 
See the Men's Brooks Cascadia 19  See the Women's Brooks Cascadia 19

Best for Ultras With Sustained Climbs and Descents

 11. Salomon S/Lab Ultra Glide 1.5 ($250)

Weight: 1 lb. 4.0 oz. (unisex)
Cushioning: 41mm heel, 35mm toe
Drop: 6mm
What we like: A soft-yet-springy cushion paired with a stretchy upper makes it comfortable over long distances.
What we don’t: The fit can be tough to dial in; astronomically expensive.

Highly cushioned shoes have continued to win us over during the past few seasons; Salomon's cushioned, springy S/Lab Ultra Glide 1.5 is no exception. These shoes are in their glory during runs and events with sustained descents and ascents. While stiffer shoes perform well on short, punchy ascents and descents, the cushioned, stable, and propulsive design has made the S/Lab Ultraglide a go-to shoe for extended runs, and we can see them being a pair we reach for during ultras with long climbs and descents. However, it's tricky to get underfoot stability with such a tall stack, and while this shoe is impressively stable for its cushioning, it's still not the best for highly off-camber, techy terrain. 

While the S/Lab line as a whole is supremely comfortable, we've had fit issues over the past year. Similar to the S/Lab Pulsar 4, the Ultra Glide 1.5 runs fairly large, and we recommend trying before you buy. One of our testers went a full size down, and another went a half size. Part of this might be the unisex sizing, which means runners with low-volume feet who typically wear women's shoes won't get the same fit with the S/Lab line. Further, the tall collar, while recently updated, still rubbed our ankles, and the pair is more than 3 ounces heavier than our top-ranked Salomon S/Lab Pulsar 4. But if you can dial in your size and have a long training cycle or ultra ahead of you, these are worth a look if you can get past the price.
See the Salomon S/ Lab Ultraglide 1.5

 

Lightweight Shoe With Rockplate Protection

12. Men's On Cloudultra 3 & Women's Cloudultra 3 ($190)

Weight: 1 lb. 4.8 oz. (men's), 1 lb. 0.4 oz. (women's)
Cushioning: 32.5mm heel, 26.5mm toe
Drop: 6mm
What we like: Lightweight and breathable, deep lugs deliver incredible traction, incredible stability. 
What we don't: The tongue hits high on your ankle; not super comfortable for road runs. 

Designed to make you feel light on your feet, the On Cloudultra 3 shoes feature hyper-foam dual midsoles that deliver high energy return and propulsion thanks to their rockered shape. The woven uppers feature engineered zoning that helps maximize airflow, keeping your feet cool even on the hottest days, and we appreciated the quick-dry properties when navigating creek crossings. The Cloudultras are advertised as having moderate cushioning, and some speed-oriented runners might prefer even less to better feel and respond to the trail. On our end, we felt the cushioning was just enough to feel supported, and appreciated the added protection of the rock plate between the midsole and outsole. 

In terms of fit, the Cloudultra 3 runs true to size and is comfortable throughout. Our only fit complaint is that the tongue hits high on your ankle, making higher socks a necessity to avoid rubbing and blisters. One of the most noteworthy features of the Cloudultras is their impressive grip—the Missiongrip outsoles have deep lugs that deliver reliable traction on steep, slippery, and uneven surfaces. While the deep lugs are a game changer for trail runs, they do feel a little funky on pavement, so you’ll want to swap out your shoes for road-heavy runs. The Cloudultras have a wide midsole, a cupped heel that cradles your foot, and fairly firm foam, which combine to deliver an incredibly stable shoe. Thanks to the impressive stability and energy return, the Cloudultras have become one of our top picks for longer trail runs and potential ultra shoes.
See the Men's On Cloudultra 3  See the Women's On Cloudultra 3

A Durable Option for Wide Feet

13. Men's Topo Athletic Mtn Racer 4 & Women's Mtn Racer 4 ($155)

Weight: 1 lb. 4.8 oz. (men's), 1 lb.1.0 oz. (women's)
Cushioning: 33mm heel, 28mm toe
Drop: 5mm
What we like: A wonderful all-arounder that holds up well over the long term.
What we don't: The wide toe box might be a dealbreaker for some.

Topo Athletic might not be a household name like Salomon or Brooks, but their lineup of trail and road running shoes speaks for itself, plus their founder is the former CEO of Vibram. The Mtn Racer 4 is a standout trail-specific model in their quiver: Like the Lone Peak, it features a wide toe box that lends all-day comfort for swollen and hard-working feet, and has become another thru-hiker favorite. But the Mtn Racer tacks on some technical chops the Lone Peak lacks, with a 5-millimeter drop, slightly firmer cushioning, a sticky Vibram Megagrip sole (a popular blend in approach shoes), and a 1.6-ounce weight decrease. Added up, it’s a great all-around option for everything from easy to technical trails, and the durable build should last upwards of 500 miles.

However, the Mtn Racer isn't a perfect shoe. While Topo increased the stack height from the 2 to 3, and updated the insole for better rebound in the 4, we had serious fit issues in the 3. Despite employing every lacing technique in the book, we were unable to get a solid lock at the ankle and ended up swimming around in the shoe while running on local trails. The 4 claims to have updated these issues for a more performance-oriented fit, and we've had good luck during this season of testing, even for runners with lower volume feet. 
See the Men's Topo Mtn Racer 4  See the Women's Topo Mtn Racer 4

High Level of Durability 

 14. NNormal Tomir 2.0 ($180)

Weight: 1 lb. 4.3 oz. (unisex)
Cushioning: 33mm heel, 25mm toe
Drop: 8mm
What we like: Asymmetrical lacing reduces pressure points; highly durable build.
What we don’t: Expensive; runs a little big.

This trail-focused company was founded in the fall of 2022 as a joint venture between Camper—a family-run shoe-making business based in Mallorca, Spain—and one of the greatest mountain athletes of all time, Killian Jornet. At the time of publishing, NNormal offers a small lineup of shoes and apparel, all designed with a focus on longevity and sustainability. Killian himself raced in NNormal prototypes for the 2022 race season, allegedly wearing the same shoes for his wins at both Hardrock and UTMB. If that’s not a glowing endorsement for performance and durability, we don’t know what is. The Tomir is NNormal’s flagship all-rounder, marketed for everything from easy trails to speed workouts and peak-bagging, and its durability is among the best we've tested. 

A few key design features help the Tomir live a long life: The upper is stitched into the midsole, asymmetrical lacing reduces pressure and wear points, and the Vibram Litebase sole has proven both rugged and durable in our testing. Other areas where the shoe stood out were comfort and responsiveness, serving as our technically savvy daily driver for over 100 miles. And to streamline the design process, the unisex fit accommodates most foot sizes without stepping into truly wide toe-box territory, though those on the fence may want to size down (we did and were happy with the overall fit).
See the NNormal Tomir 2.0

Reliable on Varied Terrain

15. The North Face Vectiv Enduris 4 ($160)

Weight: 1 lb. 4.2 oz. (men's), 1 lb. 1.9 oz. (women's)
Cushioning: 33mm heel, 28mm toe
Drop: 6mm
What we like: A reliable and comfortable daily training shoe.
What we don’t: Not particularly fast, especially compared to more high-end Vectiv offerings.

The North Face hasn’t always been much of a player in trail running, but that all changed with the release of their Vectiv lineup. The growing collection now includes a gaggle of hiking and trail running offerings with a signature rockered sole and moderate-to-maximum midsole cushioning. The Enduris 4 is the daily trainer, providing runners a plush underfoot feel and a responsive ride that’s forgiving enough to go all day. The Enduris 4 also features an additional 2 millimeters of midsole padding compared to the previous-generation 3, aligning with the current trend toward max-cushioned trail shoes. Tack on an airy mesh upper, a full rubber outsole, an accommodating fit, and increased stability via the Vectiv 3.0 midsole, and the latest Enduris continues to stand out as an excellent all-arounder. 

Runners looking for an upgrade might also be interested in the higher-end Vectiv Sky 2, which boasts flashy selling points like a carbon-fiber plate and a number of notable podium finishes. We've also been loving the Vectiv Pro 3, with 36.5 millimeters of underfoot cushioning and stride-mapped foam inserts for additional propulsion and cushioning. Both of these other models are great race-day option that offers an excellent combination of speed and stability. But the more affordable Enduris is the indisputable daily driver, with a much more forgiving feel and fit for most feet. What’s more, you can even push it off-trail thanks to the tacky SurfaceCtrl rubber—the Enduris 3 was the only shoe that fit our swollen feet during the latter half of the North Cascades High Route and got the job done on snowy, rocky, and loose terrain. All told, for a more cushioned alternative to an everyday shoe like the Sense Ride 5, the Enduris 4 is well deserving of a closer look.
See the Men's TNF Vectiv Enduris 4  See the Women's TNF Vectiv Enduris 4

Extreme Ground Cushion for Ultrarunners

16. Men's Hoka Mafate X & Women's Hoka Mafate X ($225)

Weight: 1 lb. 8.2 oz. (men's), 1 lb. 4.6 oz. (women's)
Cushioning: 41.5mm heel, 34.5mm toe
Drop: 7mm
What we like: Supremely comfortable underfoot; very bouncy midsole.
What we don’t: Not stable on technical terrain; some heel slippage on the uphills.

Hoka keeps raising the (midsole) bar, and the supremely plush Mafate X won't just keep you protected from the ground; it'll help you grow a few inches as well. With a whopping 41.5 millimeters under the heel, these are not the shoes for technical terrain, but they are incredibly fun with so much energy it almost feels like cheating as you fly down the trail. The fit is accurate through the upper, with just enough room in the toe and forefoot to fit comfortably without feeling sloppy. The traction has a similar design to Hoka's Speedgoat 6, with a wide open-foam midfoot section to shave weight, though the Mafate X is still among the heaviest on this list, and the foam reduces traction in mud. 

The midsole is made of dual-density PEBA and EVA foam, which adds underfoot spring, and the rockered shape increases propulsion. While we were able to get a decently secure heel lock by tightening the laces and using the offset eyelets, runners looking to feel the ground beneath their feet should look elsewhere. Despite the maximalist build, it didn't take the top spot in the Best Cushioned category away from the Speedgoat 6. We've been enjoying our test runs in the Mafate X, but for routes or races with technical terrain, we'll still reach for more nimble, secure shoes like the Salomon S/Lab Ultra Glide or Saucony Peregrine 15. 
See the Men's Hoka Mafate X See the Women's Hoka Mafate X

Tested & Dismissed Trail Running Shoes

Merrell has a robust line of trail running shoes, and while we were fans of the original Long Sky, the latest Long Sky II fell far short of the original's comfort and support. The new model is pared-down, but it ended up feeling flimsy and undercushioned. 

We also tested the Flux Adapt, which we thought might be a good alternative for runners who like Altra's wide toebox. Ultimately, the Adapt's performance didn't impress us enough to unseat the Lone Peak, and it is too niche in terms of shape and fit to list on its own. The Salomon Genesis didn't make the cut either. Our listed Salomon shoes are so high performing that the more average Genesis, while reasonably priced, wasn't a standout in any category. The shoes underperformed in fit and versatility, took a long time to dry out after getting wet, and the traction felt unreliable on technical terrain. 

We removed a few shoes from the list for this update, including the Nike Zegama 2 and Nike Pegasus Trail 5. Both Nike shoes will get the job done, and while we appreciate the road-to-trail outsole of the Pegasus Trail 5, the shoes have started to feel dated and underperform in terms of support compared to more backcountry-oriented brands. 

Lastly, the Scarpa Golden Gate 2 ATR was also dropped after another season of testing. Scarpa makes excellent hiking shoes, but their running shoes have a stiff underfoot feel, and we ended up with arch soreness after just short runs. Runners looking for structure without stiffness will likely appreciate our listed Salomon Speedcross 6 more.
 

Trail Running Shoe Comparison Table

About Our Testing Process

The Switchback Travel team has been cruising mellow mountain singletrack and boulder-strewn trails for years. Our founding members drew from runs, races, and mountain scrambles to curate our initial round-up of 10 shoes back in 2016. Senior editor Chris Carter took over the guide in 2024 with help from testers Ben Stalheim and Sasha Brown. A dedicated ultrarunner, Chris has worn down the tread of countless trail shoes over thousands of miles and is all too familiar with the sinking feeling of uncomfortable feet mid-run. Contributing editor Maggie Slepian jumped on the bandwagon to help oversee this lineup in 2025, backed by more than a decade of professional shoe testing, thru-hiking, and four-season trail running in Montana, Utah, the northeast, and the West Coast. 

Our current selection of 16 trail runners is the result of continued on-trail testing and feedback from seasoned contributors and the running community as a whole. We put trail running shoes through a variety of real-world tests—from after-work jaunts on local trails to organized ultras—to gauge their performance. Stability, cushioning, traction, and weight are all key factors we consider when assessing a shoe's merits, and each model must prove itself over many miles (generally at least 50) before earning a spot on our list. Finally, as mentioned, the competition for the trail-shoe podium is fierce and constantly evolving. As a result, we continue to test new and noteworthy shoes as they become available, adding any standouts to our list.
 

Trail Running Shoe Buying Advice

• How to Choose a Trail Running Shoe
• Weight
• Traction
• Cushioning (Stack Height)
• Heel-to-Toe Drop
• Stability
• Waterproofing
• Breathability
• Toe Protection
• Rock Plates
• Mountain Running Shoes
• Road-to-Trail Shoe Recommendations
• Hiking and Backpacking in Trail Running Shoes

How to Choose a Trail Running Shoe 

Selecting the best trail running shoe comes down to a variety of factors, including the style of running, terrain, distance, and your own fit preferences. We used to divide our top picks into trail type, but after years of testing, we realized most running shoes defy true categories. It's more about the synergy between the shoes, the terrain, and the runner. However, there are still a good number of clues that can help you narrow down your choices.
 

Most shoes here are great all-rounders: sufficient for most runners on a range of terrain. But if you have specific demands for a shoe—like running far, fast, or remotely—you'll want to look at a specialist shoe. In general, max-cushioned shoes are great for ultra distances, such as the Hoka Speedgoat 6. Runners venturing off-trail will want to prioritize protection, stability, and sticky tread, all of which the La Sportiva Bushido III offers. And for speed, look for a locked-in shoe with a sleeker design, like the Salomon S/Lab Pulsar 4. Most runners find a shoe they love and stick with it year after year.
 

Weight

We put a high priority on weight when considering a trail running shoe. For 2025, our picks range from just 1 pound 1.6 ounces for the Salomon S/Lab Pulsar 4 to 1 pound 8.2 ounces for the men's Hoka Mafate X. Feathery designs will feel light on your feet and are perfect for speedwork, while heavier shoes with maximum cushioning are often more ruggedly built for off-trail exploring. Each design has compromises: Many lighter options lack overall protection and support, while designs like the Mafate X can be fairly cumbersome on easy trails. In general, the sweet spot is often right in the middle: You'll get enough protection and support for long distances without feeling sluggish.
 

Traction

Traction is one of the places we see the most variation. In general, the grip level provided will follow the intended trail usage. Shoes for easy trails feature a combination of outsole rubber and exposed midsole foam, which lends a lightweight, springy feel but is particularly prone to slipping on slippery rocks, roots, and mud. On the other hand, shoes built for rugged trails often have a full-rubber outsole for excellent traction in mountainous terrain, such as snow, boulder hopping, and scree. All-rounders fall somewhere in between and are a great middle-ground option for most trail running objectives.
 

Looking closer at the nitty-gritty of traction, an outsole’s rubber compound, tread depth, and tread pattern all play a role in maximizing grip. Shoes that have sticky, approach-shoe-like rubber, like the La Sportiva Bushido III, excel on rock, while others that have a softer and more pliable feel often do better in mud. Secondly, tread depth (lug depth as defined by millimeters) isn’t listed by all manufacturers, but you can get a good idea of the size by looking at an image of the sole. Tall lugs, like those on the Salomon Speedcross 6, provide excellent bite in loose ground, but their raised profile can reduce stability. Finally, the tread design should be considered: Widely spaced, tall lugs with a soft compound will outperform tightly spaced, short lugs, and sticky rubber in mud, and the reverse is typically true over rock or hardpack.
 

Cushioning (Stack Height)

We often refer to cushioning as “stack height:" the measured height from where the foot sits inside the shoe to the ground. Trail running models range from minimalist to heavily cushioned, with most generalist options falling somewhere in the middle. Minimalist designs with low-profile midsole foam can be extremely nimble and provide a close groundfeel, but we've experienced sore feet after long days in shoes with less than 20 millimeters of stack height. Maximum-cushioned shoes are the most popular these days, with offerings including 40 millimeters under the heel in the Speedgoat 6 and 37 millimeters in the La Sportiva Prodigio Max. These are incredibly well cushioned for comfort over long distances, but you naturally lose ground feel and stability. Midrange shoes, like the 28-millimeter Saucony Peregrine 15 are a good middle ground for protection without losing energy return and balance. 
 

Heel-to-Toe Drop

As the name indicates, the heel-to-toe drop is the difference in shoe height from the heel to the toe. This spec was barely on the radar of folks outside the hardcore running community until the zero-drop fad hit a few years ago. Many all-rounder shoes have a drop of 4 to 8 millimeters, which can work well for both heel and midfoot strikers. True zero-drop shoes have a 0-millimeter drop, encouraging a mid- or forefoot landing. And many rugged-trail models have the most dramatic drops, often 8 to 10 millimeters.

We believe heel-toe drop is a matter of comfort and personal preference. Many people like a moderate drop in their trail running shoes, while others prefer a zero-drop design like the Altra Lone Peak. The general trend is toward lower-drop shoes, though performance and injury-prevention claims are hotly debated. No matter what you choose, it's important to avoid major changes to your shoe design without easing into it (mileage-wise). This will reduce the chance of injury and ensure that it's the right choice for you.
 

Stability

Trying to move fast over rough terrain in a pair of lightweight low-top shoes may seem like asking for an injury, but today’s trail running shoes offer a stable ride resistant to ankle rolls. This starts with a solid platform that's wide and rigid enough to sustain hard impacts on uneven ground—a great example is the Topo Athletic Mtn Racer 4. The chassis—the perimeter of the base of the shoe—is often beefed up to create that solid base. In addition, some shoes include a shank, a semi-rigid piece of plastic or nylon between the midsole and outsole for added stiffness. Finally, some manufacturers create reinforced overlays around the heel cup for added structure and rollover protection. The relative stiffness and stability of a shoe often correlate with its intended use: A mountain-oriented shoe like the La Sportiva Bushido III is stiffer and has more structure, while lighter trail runners like the Brooks Catamount still provide protection but have fewer reinforcements and overlays. 
 

Waterproofing

Wet feet can be a big reason for going home early, and many trail shoes are offered in waterproof versions, which feature a waterproof and breathable membrane (usually Gore-Tex) between the outer fabric and the shoe’s inner lining. These shoes are generally a few ounces heavier per pair and $15 to $40 more, but the waterproofing is effective and especially makes sense in cold weather, when wet feet become cold feet in a hurry.
 

That said, we’re not huge fans of waterproof trail running shoes for a few reasons. Waterproof membranes significantly impact breathability, creating a ripe environment for clammy feet. What’s more, drying time suffers, with no way for water (or sweat) to leave once it's inside. Further, while they guard against low-lying puddles and streams, waterproof shoes do nothing to prevent water from entering at the ankle. In the end, we can see the appeal for shoulder seasons or winter, but for most runners, the tradeoffs simply aren’t worth it. For more on this topic, check out our article: Do You Need Waterproof Hiking Shoes? You can also see our top waterproof hiking shoes, which include plenty of trail-running options. 
 

Breathability

The ventilating ability of a shoe is one of the most important factors for runners. Nylon mesh is a common material used in trail running shoes for increased breathability. To retain durability, many manufacturers combine a tight weave with a thin fabric to resist tears and keep air flowing. Some are more accomplished than others, and we recommend looking for shoes built with mesh and few overlays, like the Salomon Pulsar 4 or On Cloudultra 3. 
 

Toe Protection

Trail running naturally puts you in terrain more challenging and potentially hazardous than what you’ll find around town, and we love any added toe protection from your shoe’s construction. Trail running shoes often include a rubber toe guard or cap that can absorb direct hits. Because of the lightweight intent of a trail runner, the toe protection isn’t as substantial as a hiking shoe, but it should prevent your toes from turning black and blue should you accidentally kick a rock or root on the trail.
 

Rock Plates

Much in the same way that a protective toe cap isolates you from a sharp rock or other trail debris, lightweight rock plates are inserted between the midsole and outsole on many trail shoes. These plates vary in thickness, coverage, and materials, ranging from thin and flexible ESS foam under the ball of the foot to a stiff TPU shank. How much protection is needed depends on personal preference and the terrain you'll be running over (more miles on rough trails will merit burlier protection), but overall, we find rock plates to be a great feature. They’re unobtrusive, keep foot soreness to a minimum, and only add a small amount of weight.
 

Lacing Systems

Most shoes use a standard lace-up method, but brands like Salomon are doing things differently with a single-pull “Quicklace” system on their trail runners. We love this design on the Speedcross 6, Pulsar 4, and S/Lab Ultraglide for its ease of use and speed. It only requires a single pull, and you can tuck away the excess laces and forget about them. We’ve found that the laces hold securely, but for runners with finicky feet who need to customize the fit, there isn’t a quick-lace solution: they will fit equally tight all around. Accordingly, we recommend avoiding them if you often struggle to achieve a good fit. 
 

 Mountain Running Shoes

Mountain running is experiencing a huge growth spurt, with more and more enthusiasts ditching heavy overnight gear for a pair of running shoes and a light pack. By our definition, this style of running takes you off-trail and into cross-country zones, where you might encounter anything from technical rock climbing and talus or boulder fields to glacier travel and steep snow—think ridge scrambling in the Rockies or peak bagging in the North Cascades. And you’ll need just the right footwear to tackle this complex terrain: A shoe that combines the light weight and comfort of a trail runner with the stability, grip, and durability of an approach or hiking shoe. By another definition, mountain running is a USATF-sanctioned sport in which elite runners race on short and steep courses. This is different from mountain running and requires a different skill set and a focus on much lighter footwear.
 

Fortunately, a whole new class of mountain-running-specific shoes has emerged recently, engineered specifically for off-trail trickery. La Sportiva leads the field here, but designs from brands like Dynafit, Salomon, and Scarpa come in close behind (some of our favorites include the La Sportiva Bushido III, and Scarpa Ribelle Run). Within this category, look for sticky rubber outsoles (Megagrip and FriXion are common compounds) with shallow lugs and a smooth patch near the toe for climbing performance. Many will feature a lower, more planted feel for stability on off-camber terrain, aided by moderate-to-light cushioning in the middle. Finally, they’re relatively stiff and have durable and protective uppers (we often strap crampons or microspikes to our mountain running shoes). For more, check out our editor's picks for the best mountain running gear.
 

Road-to Trail Shoe Recommendations

Plenty of runners leave their front door and run on a mix of pavement and trails, but most trail running shoes aren't designed for pavement. With full rubber soles, firm midsoles, and more protective uppers, they’ll feel overbuilt and heavy, and the softer rubber compounds can wear out prematurely if subjected to a lot of road running. 
 

A few hybrid designs toe the line between the two worlds, including the Hoka Challenger 7, Topo Athletic MT-5, and Altra Outroad 3, but their trail performance is so middling that we don’t include them in our main guide. However, the Brooks Divide 5 can handle pavement better than many other trail shoes, and there are a few new gravel-specific models, like the Salomon Aero Glide 3 GRVL, that can handle pavement, gravel, and light trails. These shoes often feature some of the same components as road running shoes, including soft midsoles and airy mesh uppers. Don’t expect them to be particularly great performers on pavement (the trail-ready rubber outsole will feel cumbersome), but they’ll get you from your doorstep to the trail—and back—better than most.
 

Hiking and Backpacking in Trail Running Shoes

Trail running shoes have become wildly popular for everyone from day hikers to thru-hikers. And it makes sense: With a lightweight and flexible build that doesn't skimp on traction, you can cover more ground with less effort. Further, most day hikers and thru-hikers keep pack weight to a minimum, so there’s less need for the stability and ankle support of a sturdy shoe or boot. Brooks' Cascadia has long defined this category of crossover trail shoes, and we see many hikers wearing the Hoka Speedgoat 6 and the Altra Lone Peak 9. One editor who hiked the Triple Crown had nothing but rave reviews for both the Lone Peak and Speedgoat after thousands of miles of hard trail. Once he found the joy of hiking in trail runners, he never looked back.
 

But there are a number of obvious issues. One is durability. It’s unlikely you’ll get as many miles out of your trail runners as you would a lightweight hiking shoe or full-on hiking boot, which are designed to handle more use and abuse. Second, with minimal materials and bulk, a trail runner simply does not offer the same amount of protection as beefier hiking footwear, especially those with generous rubber rands and leather uppers. Finally, we don’t recommend trail running shoes for heavy loads or particularly rugged terrain, when you’ll want a more supportive option. But despite these potential downsides, trail runners seem to be here to stay as a popular hiking and backpacking option, and models like the Lone Peak and Speedgoats offer more durability over the long haul than one might imagine. If you want to take a deeper dive into the available options, check out our article on Hiking Shoes vs. Trail Runners. 
Back to Our Trail Running Shoe Picks  Back to Our Trail Runner Comparison Table